DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: "Mattias Rönnblom" <hofors@lysator.liu.se>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: RTE lock
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 12:50:27 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240305125027.7814d9a8@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0024db51-8b39-4aa7-969a-bde86fe1c764@lysator.liu.se>

On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 21:18:20 +0100
Mattias Rönnblom <hofors@lysator.liu.se> wrote:

> Shouldn't we have a DPDK-native mutex API, rather than using direct 
> POSIX mutex lock calls?
> 
> There are two reasons for this, as I see it
> 1) more cleanly support non-POSIX operating system (i.e., Microsoft 
> Windows).
> 2) to discourage mechanical use of spinlocks in places where a regular 
> mutex lock is more appropriate.
> 
> I think (and hope) DPDK developers will tend to pick DPDK-native rather 
> than other APIs as their first choice.
> 
> For locks, they go for spinlocks, even in control (non-fast 
> path/non-packet processing) code paths (e.g., calls made by the typical 
> non-EAL thread).
> 
> Using spinlocks to synchronize threads that may be preempted aren't 
> great idea.

Maybe a wrapper, but actually implementing mutex with flock is complicated.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-05 20:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-05 20:18 Mattias Rönnblom
2024-03-05 20:50 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2024-03-05 21:02 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2024-03-07 19:50   ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-03-07 20:27     ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-03-08  9:44       ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-03-06  8:46 ` Morten Brørup

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240305125027.7814d9a8@hermes.local \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=hofors@lysator.liu.se \
    --cc=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).