From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFB5943C12;
	Thu,  7 Mar 2024 18:06:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B209E410D5;
	Thu,  7 Mar 2024 18:06:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-pf1-f177.google.com (mail-pf1-f177.google.com
 [209.85.210.177])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C85544067E
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu,  7 Mar 2024 18:06:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-pf1-f177.google.com with SMTP id
 d2e1a72fcca58-6e5dddd3b95so876364b3a.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 07 Mar 2024 09:06:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1709831172;
 x=1710435972; darn=dpdk.org; 
 h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to
 :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date
 :message-id:reply-to;
 bh=4ePr+aMONJ6RXRfy763I6B7kmO2KrRf6D+pZZ31i+PY=;
 b=GYc07L2kHt9I74vQ6cB5dtKEpNQGZz+jVTlADoQK1IHBcLacDL3jOCC1rxReEdfQjc
 eEtY29l8NSdfMLYqea1q9GMeNYaDlfdxljOwbnOpfoZZ5h+CiLlyswdabOLyqMiqqVoy
 wA6YudaudvLoBMZapAyMJnXP8rQ/gt1tzcomNViVvXL8JqwXa+DSvqWSFttJZVNhTw/b
 g9+PPVBsO8JKPUKW6YrQs/88yhi2OU3flC2M/+zyRtX/2ngPOnW+s4u9do0d7aWCyefd
 WTEA1EIPwhnRwAbEbNvakkbTCOxBays2zDeq7JB9QmD/OKVPAdkd/1qH3PT3tyMg/Z0A
 kw0g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1709831172; x=1710435972;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to
 :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
 :subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=4ePr+aMONJ6RXRfy763I6B7kmO2KrRf6D+pZZ31i+PY=;
 b=NlMgnYXvOCxRsz+5ZP6cVO/bU8xeiI+fzoWQ3DZHL99tXYSxlHo8opFSMi19DVyAMr
 4c3otWelmtdbJH7AwESQ+2LrG9g2kJsL7ExtTej1myz9RZyM3YhcrYjtT10PAB+lhmEN
 H+vry7+LLO048StCDPV85W/2MCHKkxR6FqDH4P2s7XQPaqHvkFYSlfd/dDeP1YSEHglb
 y21dpJb8ckd4EUY9M594GT7BLQJTU3FMRl8XTpBSiUIyxOsFAMkj6dveflk9yxZ/ahW+
 zHHmoxD641IN/ueaIcWC8dzO8S7YiDKNiXFhEavSaYypZYSGHNLgVRLpOANz5sT762+R
 Rirw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwDYYhFhzOp6HJNSybbRqMMPJv+BR1Wbdfr8PCgixokFzrd73dT
 iJfIY7/DQHLoVp5As2QwV6ARI3bGAaYzSo0MDXbZq24tR1++3Ynd+LserIHVCAk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGVhsFjV92oI5z2ntq7VXrpb5aoxhSuomXxM1pu1eygqLNJOiQL5VsuDDVb1Q1E+9bYcdXlcA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:8d96:b0:6e6:25bf:3241 with SMTP id
 im22-20020a056a008d9600b006e625bf3241mr2607951pfb.16.1709831170305; 
 Thu, 07 Mar 2024 09:06:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hermes.local (204-195-123-141.wavecable.com. [204.195.123.141])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 t26-20020a62d15a000000b006e04c3b3b5asm13724816pfl.175.2024.03.07.09.06.09
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Thu, 07 Mar 2024 09:06:10 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 09:06:08 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, bluca@debian.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] test/lcores: reduce cpu consumption
Message-ID: <20240307090608.4f8991b5@hermes.local>
In-Reply-To: <20240307141608.1450695-1-david.marchand@redhat.com>
References: <20240307113324.845309-1-david.marchand@redhat.com>
 <20240307141608.1450695-1-david.marchand@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org

On Thu,  7 Mar 2024 15:16:06 +0100
David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote:

> Busy looping on RTE_MAX_LCORES threads is too heavy in some CI or build
> systems running the fast-test testsuite.
> Ask for a reschedule at the threads synchronisation points.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> Acked-by: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
> ---

That test was always failing on my little desktop machine, now it works.

Tested-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>