DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: Jianyue Wu <wujianyue000@163.com>,
	ferruh.yigit@amd.com, dev@dpdk.org,
	Jianyue Wu <jianyue.wu@nokia-sbell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] eal/linux: enhanced error handling for affinity
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 17:18:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240426171853.7649b935@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240426154737.GB27008@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net>

On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 08:47:37 -0700
Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com> wrote:

> >  int
> > --   
> 
> i do not think introducing os specific behavior/logging to the EAL
> is a good idea. logging although not formally part of the api surface
> should present the same experience for all platforms. the EAL should
> have a higher standard here.
> 
> > 2.34.1  

For this case, the error message would be better if there was some way
to look at the cgroups and mark the cores that are not available as if
they were offline lcores.




  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-27  0:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-25 11:11 Jianyue Wu
2024-04-26 15:47 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2024-04-27  0:18   ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2024-04-28 12:26     ` Jianyue Wu
2024-10-04 17:36       ` Stephen Hemminger
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-04-23  5:20 Jianyue Wu
2021-06-09 11:25 [dpdk-dev] Does memif support primary<->secondary process communication? Wu, Jianyue (NSB - CN/Hangzhou)
2021-06-09 12:07 ` Wu, Jianyue (NSB - CN/Hangzhou)
2024-04-22 13:23   ` [PATCH] eal/linux: enhanced error handling for affinity Jianyue Wu (NSB)
2024-04-24  5:45     ` [PATCH v2] " Jianyue Wu (NSB)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240426171853.7649b935@hermes.local \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
    --cc=jianyue.wu@nokia-sbell.com \
    --cc=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=wujianyue000@163.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).