DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
Cc: "Mattias Rönnblom" <hofors@lysator.liu.se>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "ci@dpdk.org" <ci@dpdk.org>,
	dpdklab <dpdklab@iol.unh.edu>,
	"Mattias Rönnblom" <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com>,
	"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	"Aaron Conole" <aconole@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Run unit tests with C++ too
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 15:49:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240429224951.GA17852@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b329c02c-41a4-46fa-86e3-593d37ac1184@amd.com>

On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 09:01:08AM +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 4/28/2024 8:46 AM, Mattias Rönnblom wrote:
> > It would be great if the unit test suite (app/test/*) was compiled (and
> > run) using a C++ (C++11) compiler as well. At least, if such is available.
> > 
> > With the current state of affairs, header file macros or functions are
> > not verified to be functional (or even valid) C++.
> > 
> > "C is a subset of C++", which was never true, is becoming less and less so.
> > 
> > If all unit tests aren't valid C++, maybe one could start with an "opt
> > in" model.
> > 
> > A drawback of this is that the unit tests need to be both valid C and
> > valid C++.
> >
> 
> +1
> 
> cc'ing CI mailing list and CI lab.

+1 too


  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-29 22:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-28  7:46 Mattias Rönnblom
2024-04-29  8:01 ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-04-29 22:49   ` Tyler Retzlaff [this message]
2024-04-30 13:52 ` Patrick Robb
2024-04-30 18:01   ` Tyler Retzlaff
2024-04-30 20:13   ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-04-30 20:57     ` Patrick Robb
2024-05-01  9:10       ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-05-01 10:15         ` Bruce Richardson
2024-05-01 14:14         ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-05-01 14:38           ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-05-01 14:45             ` Bruce Richardson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240429224951.GA17852@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net \
    --to=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=ci@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dpdklab@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
    --cc=hofors@lysator.liu.se \
    --cc=mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).