From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22F8F44088; Tue, 21 May 2024 17:41:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0B9F402E0; Tue, 21 May 2024 17:41:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pl1-f172.google.com (mail-pl1-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B46364025C for ; Tue, 21 May 2024 17:41:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pl1-f172.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1eca195a7c8so103750395ad.2 for ; Tue, 21 May 2024 08:41:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1716306112; x=1716910912; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Lv9RtG2tr7vGn1Ix5EW2cRhAh1yXWK3K3g2ihoYZCp8=; b=xOHyUAhtQWrclwP9EIusWpb/ue83y8y/jL6B8QLLHbp/+bNQueh6dp5YKpd1U1LQjg nK4IAuszwy9WDMRbMIyZlz8elD3ziONnpVctm9w56XktAGLCZKgfSKxtKy0jhPk5j3bR OJTkmU9NsoX0ilCeQVkrKnofiWkswN6lRIEiKJGkI3nzS1BG+qG+Y/QeeND8ektM1xZY 4yUMBSJHrNzZPqhbIjK0wcDJoKcvXVb+SfbaxlxZIHJ6/WEPDBM5kuu4emvzxTJn97ss aBfJbc7nT8YoHQ+XcqmahOVyS4jpXLpUVpQVJeQQY3vWUY3+DV4IcWsUpQWmmBI46aUa 62OA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1716306112; x=1716910912; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Lv9RtG2tr7vGn1Ix5EW2cRhAh1yXWK3K3g2ihoYZCp8=; b=MBcOd/0D2f5TC3wBqwUSeT/FI3nBFybUfYbvZajiUcyJsoaIBRwcYgmXaA33S1WfZB Tn9Rqr1YXBPq0XqCsvCA/w5ejndFEaKvBSV7gyfVfhNfF+oWOArjm4FPrjGqHlfeuNP0 aB57iFuHISvs8fBDHYTFB4i1HoQNCJMNmglj1delEmvg4pOg76zaZ2WlKgQ0k7lJp+KZ vsMcmeGfHHQ58AwTvW+Zxh5sHjXsZs9MPrun5PWfe2rG+JSB5/V8OllQaLOJMBW6JAFR SrgXZcKr9BIPkAevcAZtYu+bcgXaJWSqkKa5QxMSpMARW041/1tauH0BarHvMc9szfIm 9CUQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCV/gyPu9YtDs1UCfm312Ot0vk99Zni8t4s4EkSXmz0nh68rQSXl69aYt+qKW2i2NgY+kxhIgzIS+4t6qTE= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzPCQVmycP0STrkQLvdI4FAnG+O+XpWBIspA8Bm4BKoTtJQzzoa jEJH58lk7oc+bJyYZbc3pvMnu2HOU25JLsVT6/4rWlRas+t+c454ivIEK53BqPs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGK5YV9Bx9zJfT4QboNy1x20uNpw1sfGq0rv5KUuxb0qiVxUcVuRIIKhROj3Nj67L6HLWza9A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:eb92:b0:1f3:886:b3ba with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1f30886b5e2mr46563785ad.54.1716306111672; Tue, 21 May 2024 08:41:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-96-226.wavecable.com. [204.195.96.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-1ef0bf31a67sm229055545ad.149.2024.05.21.08.41.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 21 May 2024 08:41:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 08:41:49 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Aaron Conole Cc: Ferruh Yigit , Patrick Robb , Christian Ehrhardt , dpdklab , dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 07/12] net/tap: use libbpf to load new BPF program Message-ID: <20240521084149.10597121@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: References: <20240130034925.44869-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20240502213618.11391-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20240502213618.11391-8-stephen@networkplumber.org> <6bb00014-b2ee-4fc9-bdfd-7583e172d3e2@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Tue, 21 May 2024 11:06:59 -0400 Aaron Conole wrote: > > > > If we can have an Ubuntu 24.04 environment, this addresses the libbpf > > testing concern. > > I think it would be good to add as well. 24.04 will be an LTS, so it > should be support for long time. > > > @Christian can comment better, but as far as I can see although upgrade > > from previous LTS is not supported yet, it is possible to install Ubuntu > > 24.04 from scratch. > > There is a sortof procedure to do it by going via 23.10 first, but it > isn't probably the best approach. I guess installing from scratch may > be the best approach. Thanks, we need to have 24.04 test setup since when I tried it there were new warnings from fortify.