From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED4DB456A3; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 19:27:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B8D842E4C; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 19:27:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pf1-f175.google.com (mail-pf1-f175.google.com [209.85.210.175]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5942B42E1C for ; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 19:27:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pf1-f175.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-70ea2f25bfaso973495b3a.1 for ; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 10:27:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1722014876; x=1722619676; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=G+5haTh9Z/XVGx3TxXuB6Bej+jjQlAlb1+exWTEb4dA=; b=pGh+eCueUT3Qg4Ao+fSkDGHMZUPMyg+i9RUsYkmwtWVD9xD9w0SV4amEDpmhzX/ESv o14usmAIFPYd5VznFblrxRe10b2MSIO0/EZnsIYhmNI33bBQWRq+C9yaEo+TlnTR9q06 E6tK03ye/d+UMmY5rdZ8PX4mUaomwd7Kv850qgDgCTd2OdbZpS1dfQBry74MYh0dYPa5 oIUVkrhF3dyNvGdeprF/ky0ztwujtdnw0NCchf98HTE4bioEOGRl/R5MnB9W7GFEoPIT Qw5BTSqjzCYljvzsnpNsesjEe2Ggs2tdgF/agnVF+PWfMxDtS3iTAYS8WS7roIR7ZOuG x9Zg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1722014876; x=1722619676; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=G+5haTh9Z/XVGx3TxXuB6Bej+jjQlAlb1+exWTEb4dA=; b=kq3bgyQWVm+qgaYPcGlNHQj/miOpeSJ5+/EvnbXFKSGLNDPMjxfwxUWyggT0brzYnE C4tqjpi9I/nKKCOhcGDSpxxmy/gjYzWuhzguenX6NvlRRMp9A/9VWzrdO9xFQKnUVF2N P9hgK3myWIz05wzpvWsUEF4WVRHXV2MRMKaoUYFN/12Cjpz27T2cZXNmBK8AfepCLH5C ZnfZsiutRUiaVoGEb2Qr+mlvPhQ0T3QXCQRlB4cAQbVm2RfZ6viFwn0YeoSOrs0uOlTq guU3pd3Fso6ED+rMOWsmI1eJda3zE1P8D7ABky7QA9gbJhMmNa6zwY0ZnQel9oBVg+ec flHw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxTT8cRp29+Iv3BJExVl/7aDVVq06b6whQNknEKeCHwM6xKeiuh zIVgRbA90tI5lAfDI8Kj4abgxBns9yrZQFcoXUKsWyhpL4wmDYI9zLQ+6ERnpT0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFSte5K9xW4gt0dUs37zrznNKKFF2+cMBWc+9OQveEgcYJb4a9BMTDmJ405eTzTNde2X1US6A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:138e:b0:70d:37f4:2c73 with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-70ecea13e6amr225432b3a.10.1722014876137; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 10:27:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-96-226.wavecable.com. [204.195.96.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-70ead86ed90sm3075912b3a.141.2024.07.26.10.27.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 26 Jul 2024 10:27:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 10:27:54 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Patrick Robb Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Tyler Retzlaff Subject: Re: How does CI system get updated? Message-ID: <20240726102754.2a0f21ae@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: References: <20240725075506.207aad84@hermes.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 12:34:25 -0400 Patrick Robb wrote: > Okay I understand better now how we ended up with an older mingw64 > version. The DPDK Docs for windows compile direct folks over to > (https://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/) to get the > prebuilt binaries, but the latest toolchain published there is Mingw64 > v8.*, whereas the current version is v11.*. So, when we upgraded to > the "latest" published version, we upgraded to that v8.* from years > ago. If you look at the mingw64 website downloads page > (https://www.mingw-w64.org/downloads/), it directs people over to > winlibs.com to download the prebuilt binaries for v11. > > I have replaced the Windows Server 2019 CI VM's old mingw64 binaries > with the new (v11.*) ones downloaded from winlibs.com, and I see that > Stephen's patch now passes the compile test. I can issue a retest for > your series once I am all done making the update for the server 2022 > machine too. > > I guess this also raises the question of whether the DPDK docs for the > windows mingw64 compile process should be updated to point to > winlibs.com instead of sourceforge.net (only has the source code). > > https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/windows_gsg/build_dpdk.html#option-2-mingw-w64-toolchain Yes, projects move we need to keep links up to date.