From: jspewock@iol.unh.edu
To: npratte@iol.unh.edu, juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech,
yoan.picchi@foss.arm.com, thomas@monjalon.net,
Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com, probb@iol.unh.edu,
wathsala.vithanage@arm.com, paul.szczepanek@arm.com,
Luca.Vizzarro@arm.com, alex.chapman@arm.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Jeremy Spewock <jspewock@iol.unh.edu>
Subject: [PATCH v4 4/5] dts: add OS abstractions for creating virtual functions
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 14:42:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240923184235.22582-5-jspewock@iol.unh.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240923184235.22582-1-jspewock@iol.unh.edu>
From: Jeremy Spewock <jspewock@iol.unh.edu>
Virtual functions in the framework are created using SR-IOV. The process
for doing this can vary depending on the operating system, so the
commands to create VFs have to be abstracted into different classes
based on the operating system. This patch adds the stubs for methods
that create VFs and get the PCI addresses of all VFs on a port to the
abstract class as well as a linux implementation for the methods.
Bugzilla ID: 1500
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Spewock <jspewock@iol.unh.edu>
---
dts/framework/testbed_model/linux_session.py | 40 +++++++++++++++++++-
dts/framework/testbed_model/os_session.py | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/dts/framework/testbed_model/linux_session.py b/dts/framework/testbed_model/linux_session.py
index 544a665b83..2615411470 100644
--- a/dts/framework/testbed_model/linux_session.py
+++ b/dts/framework/testbed_model/linux_session.py
@@ -15,7 +15,11 @@
from typing_extensions import NotRequired
-from framework.exception import ConfigurationError, RemoteCommandExecutionError
+from framework.exception import (
+ ConfigurationError,
+ InternalError,
+ RemoteCommandExecutionError,
+)
from framework.utils import expand_range
from .cpu import LogicalCore
@@ -210,3 +214,37 @@ def configure_ipv4_forwarding(self, enable: bool) -> None:
"""Overrides :meth:`~.os_session.OSSession.configure_ipv4_forwarding`."""
state = 1 if enable else 0
self.send_command(f"sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_forward={state}", privileged=True)
+
+ def set_num_virtual_functions(self, num: int, pf_port: Port) -> bool:
+ """Overrides :meth:`~.os_session.OSSession.set_num_virtual_functions`."""
+ sys_bus_path = f"/sys/bus/pci/devices/{pf_port.pci}/sriov_numvfs".replace(":", "\\:")
+ curr_num_vfs = int(self.send_command(f"cat {sys_bus_path}").stdout)
+ if num > 0 and curr_num_vfs >= num:
+ self._logger.info(
+ f"{curr_num_vfs} VFs already configured on port {pf_port.identifier.pci} on node "
+ f"{pf_port.identifier.node}."
+ )
+ return False
+ elif num > 0 and curr_num_vfs > 0:
+ self._logger.error(
+ f"Not enough VFs configured on port {pf_port.identifier.pci} on node "
+ f"{pf_port.identifier.node}. Need {num} but only {curr_num_vfs} are configured. "
+ "DTS is unable to modify number of preexisting VFs."
+ )
+ raise InternalError("Failed to create VFs on port.")
+ self.send_command(f"echo {num} > {sys_bus_path}", privileged=True, verify=True)
+ return True
+
+ def get_pci_addr_of_vfs(self, pf_port: Port) -> list[str]:
+ """Overrides :meth:`~.os_session.OSSession.get_pci_addr_of_vfs`."""
+ sys_bus_path = f"/sys/bus/pci/devices/{pf_port.pci}".replace(":", "\\:")
+ curr_num_vfs = int(self.send_command(f"cat {sys_bus_path}/sriov_numvfs").stdout)
+ if curr_num_vfs > 0:
+ pci_addrs = self.send_command(
+ 'awk -F "PCI_SLOT_NAME=" "/PCI_SLOT_NAME=/ {print \\$2}" '
+ + f"{sys_bus_path}/virtfn*/uevent",
+ privileged=True,
+ )
+ return pci_addrs.stdout.splitlines()
+ else:
+ return []
diff --git a/dts/framework/testbed_model/os_session.py b/dts/framework/testbed_model/os_session.py
index 79f56b289b..191fc3c0c8 100644
--- a/dts/framework/testbed_model/os_session.py
+++ b/dts/framework/testbed_model/os_session.py
@@ -395,3 +395,43 @@ def configure_ipv4_forwarding(self, enable: bool) -> None:
Args:
enable: If :data:`True`, enable the forwarding, otherwise disable it.
"""
+
+ @abstractmethod
+ def set_num_virtual_functions(self, num: int, pf_port: Port) -> bool:
+ """Update the number of virtual functions (VFs) on a port.
+
+ It should be noted that, due to the nature of VFs, if there are already VFs that exist on
+ the physical function (PF) prior to calling this function, additional ones cannot be added.
+ The only way to add more VFs is to remove the existing and then set the desired amount. For
+ this reason, this method will handle creation in the following order:
+
+ 1. Use existing VFs on the PF if the number of existing VFs is greater than or equal to
+ `num`
+ 2. Throw an exception noting that VFs cannot be created if the PF has some VFs already set
+ on it, but the total VFs that it has are less then `num`.
+ 3. Create `num` VFs on the PF if there are none on it already
+
+ Args:
+ num: The number of VFs to set on the port.
+ pf_port: The port to add the VFs to.
+
+ Raises:
+ InternalError: If `pf_port` has less than `num` VFs configured on it
+ already.
+
+ Returns:
+ :data:`True` if this method successfully created VFs, :data:`False` if existing VFs
+ were used instead.
+ """
+
+ @abstractmethod
+ def get_pci_addr_of_vfs(self, pf_port: Port) -> list[str]:
+ """Find the PCI addresses of all virtual functions (VFs) on the port `pf_port`.
+
+ Args:
+ pf_port: The port to find the VFs on.
+
+ Returns:
+ A list containing all of the PCI addresses of the VFs on the port. If the port has no
+ VFs then the list will be empty.
+ """
--
2.46.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-23 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-21 19:15 [RFC PATCH v1 0/5] dts: add VFs to the framework jspewock
2024-08-21 19:15 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/5] dts: allow binding only a single port to a different driver jspewock
2024-08-21 19:15 ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/5] dts: parameterize what ports the TG sends packets to jspewock
2024-08-21 19:15 ` [RFC PATCH v1 3/5] dts: add class for virtual functions jspewock
2024-08-21 19:15 ` [RFC PATCH v1 4/5] dts: add OS abstractions for creating " jspewock
2024-08-21 19:15 ` [RFC PATCH v1 5/5] dts: add functions for managing VFs to Node jspewock
2024-08-21 19:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] dts: add VFs to the framework jspewock
2024-08-21 19:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] dts: allow binding only a single port to a different driver jspewock
2024-08-21 19:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] dts: parameterize what ports the TG sends packets to jspewock
2024-08-21 19:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] dts: add class for virtual functions jspewock
2024-08-21 19:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/5] dts: add OS abstractions for creating " jspewock
2024-08-21 19:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/5] dts: add functions for managing VFs to Node jspewock
2024-08-21 19:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] dts: add VFs to the framework jspewock
2024-08-21 19:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] dts: allow binding only a single port to a different driver jspewock
2024-08-21 19:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] dts: parameterize what ports the TG sends packets to jspewock
2024-08-21 19:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] dts: add class for virtual functions jspewock
2024-08-21 19:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/5] dts: add OS abstractions for creating " jspewock
2024-08-21 19:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/5] dts: add functions for managing VFs to Node jspewock
2024-08-21 19:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] dts: add VFs to the framework Jeremy Spewock
2024-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC PATCH v3 " jspewock
2024-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/5] dts: allow binding only a single port to a different driver jspewock
2024-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/5] dts: parameterize what ports the TG sends packets to jspewock
2024-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/5] dts: add class for virtual functions jspewock
2024-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/5] dts: add OS abstractions for creating " jspewock
2024-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC PATCH v3 5/5] dts: add functions for managing VFs to Node jspewock
2024-09-23 18:42 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] dts: add VFs to the framework jspewock
2024-09-23 18:42 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] dts: allow binding only a single port to a different driver jspewock
2024-09-25 8:45 ` Juraj Linkeš
2024-11-14 16:45 ` Luca Vizzarro
2024-09-23 18:42 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] dts: parameterize what ports the TG sends packets to jspewock
2024-09-25 10:58 ` Juraj Linkeš
2024-11-14 17:01 ` Luca Vizzarro
2024-09-23 18:42 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] dts: add class for virtual functions jspewock
2024-09-25 11:28 ` Juraj Linkeš
2024-11-14 17:10 ` Luca Vizzarro
2024-09-23 18:42 ` jspewock [this message]
2024-09-25 12:05 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] dts: add OS abstractions for creating " Juraj Linkeš
2024-11-14 17:29 ` Luca Vizzarro
2024-09-23 18:42 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] dts: add functions for managing VFs to Node jspewock
2024-09-25 13:29 ` Juraj Linkeš
2024-11-14 17:36 ` Luca Vizzarro
2024-09-25 8:24 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] dts: add VFs to the framework Juraj Linkeš
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240923184235.22582-5-jspewock@iol.unh.edu \
--to=jspewock@iol.unh.edu \
--cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=Luca.Vizzarro@arm.com \
--cc=alex.chapman@arm.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech \
--cc=npratte@iol.unh.edu \
--cc=paul.szczepanek@arm.com \
--cc=probb@iol.unh.edu \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=wathsala.vithanage@arm.com \
--cc=yoan.picchi@foss.arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).