From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Wojciech Panfil <wojciech.panfil@intel.com>
Cc: <bruce.richardson@intel.com>, <pallavi.kadam@intel.com>,
<dev@dpdk.org>, <jacek.kalwas@intel.com>,
<konrad.sztyber@intel.com>, <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>,
<roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eal/alarm_cancel: Fix thread starvation
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2024 09:40:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240928094053.47f3c72c@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240925194206.106825-1-wojciech.panfil@intel.com>
On Wed, 25 Sep 2024 21:42:06 +0200
Wojciech Panfil <wojciech.panfil@intel.com> wrote:
> Issue:
> Two threads:
>
> - A, executing rte_eal_alarm_cancel,
> - B, executing eal_alarm_callback.
>
> Such case can cause starvation of thread B. Please see that there is a
> small time window between lock and unlock in thread A, so thread B must
> be switched to within a very small time window, so that it can obtain
> the lock.
>
> Solution to this problem is use sched_yield(), which puts current thread
> (A) at the end of thread execution priority queue and allows thread B to
> execute.
>
> The issue can be observed e.g. on hot-pluggable device detach path.
> On such path, rte_alarm can used to check if DPDK has completed
> the detachment. Waiting for completion, rte_eal_alarm_cancel
> is called, while another thread periodically calls eal_alarm_callback
> causing the issue to occur.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wojciech Panfil <wojciech.panfil@intel.com>
It would be good to get test for this in the DPDK functional test.
See: https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20240809152540.9568-4-stephen@networkplumber.org/
Reviewed-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-28 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-25 19:42 Wojciech Panfil
2024-09-28 16:40 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2024-10-04 12:00 ` David Marchand
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-09-18 11:39 Wojciech Panfil
2024-09-18 16:06 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-09-18 7:02 Wojciech Panfil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240928094053.47f3c72c@hermes.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com \
--cc=jacek.kalwas@intel.com \
--cc=konrad.sztyber@intel.com \
--cc=pallavi.kadam@intel.com \
--cc=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=wojciech.panfil@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).