From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3271A45A51; Sat, 28 Sep 2024 20:36:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 239AF402BA; Sat, 28 Sep 2024 20:36:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pl1-f177.google.com (mail-pl1-f177.google.com [209.85.214.177]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94B254025D for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2024 20:36:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pl1-f177.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-20b64584fd4so2626825ad.1 for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2024 11:36:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1727548607; x=1728153407; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=UmkZcTewKGLmqGRl32TpJ47j0q9/Cn5iPs/XTo/YKHQ=; b=zQk9g+pUzzyot8HJvxbC6P3llXk5tgu0C8rPgYmqm2Pr9Dpg/WR58K6o7cgRZ7Bxys HgFRque53c6Px6oLMyff2OvtCq7L8cdhjMm4pGyQKaiav+4nIaFDXXOKwttKiwYzLiW0 eIbfjInG1AveoB9X7iRZ15WR2/T6XfKP2RXHDLxgUePGRBPJodLJ01oQ3cT68JHOd+hA fbzuwftiTh9+x9v4qA6YKpoRWpcDNybgXSykOFFG0Ecflgk1DpLWZvkbDQj0khQ8BS30 TIP+VgdF34qALqUccBTbMXsDZAfxXuR0ilXDRYAbJNlQ8/z9pIGi6MT4/pyPYvDeV+33 v+1w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1727548607; x=1728153407; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=UmkZcTewKGLmqGRl32TpJ47j0q9/Cn5iPs/XTo/YKHQ=; b=MWYWVrG8BHO1Cb502PeHZZS8SNShTpWBnxp+4okKut639+CaBS9r//Zsro5yt8d05S hSlDCKQWf5J4dFmFk5TLnWCkEf+ABoGtJ69guLJoQHTDowABsL/jcsxhJ5MVL19ElIo+ u/08PTy4RYL8u8gbYexY8qCDU1NZ8K2W7m4bSsvbk7l18YlioMfTnl/IdYI4SAOv6PpG 9RoJSyFMJZQ+eUe34OgU2uu6jBZiVD8vV3GwGNnrhYPOBy6l2NatSWj025ICHZmOiPAr acXwPVQ+j9zD0LaKutTWJ30EAm+j11n26UitbN+mZzNBTyDZMGwJH6SutT32fb0Fii4r KTqg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCV+Umdst0Sp4hF7TBhS7zvD7yRAdVL1ymm42gollNs6jSrIZ23aN5Nau+4HzfqTAGGeOQg=@dpdk.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyAUtg4Kc5L7On09SIUmCZ94ZbTQbUB2AthHAMnPQi9mkWAcoIX ZFUMm/nZuzSGlICTbcRZ4WV9T3+ySDI1TWkw3aj23UcmCk0U27Mbfjci/1V3diw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGWK3hpVBve9dHght11NYEPupV0WD0AYGZ6A8CAn8QWxN6vg9I3uGUXvHbd4fXFhlJjMxysLg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d490:b0:200:abb6:4daf with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-20b37b7b72amr116857095ad.39.1727548606691; Sat, 28 Sep 2024 11:36:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-96-226.wavecable.com. [204.195.96.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-20b37d61db9sm29612385ad.26.2024.09.28.11.36.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 28 Sep 2024 11:36:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2024 11:36:44 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Paul Szczepanek Cc: Alex Chapman , nd@arm.com, dev@dpdk.org, Ori Kam , Aman Singh , Luca.Vizzarro@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/4] test-pmd: add more packet verbose decode options Message-ID: <20240928113644.6af2d61c@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: References: <20240312220129.70667-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20240802195824.1336603-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20240802195824.1336603-5-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20240820085443.121b024e@hermes.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Thu, 22 Aug 2024 10:04:55 +0100 Paul Szczepanek wrote: > On 20/08/2024 16:54, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Aug 2024 14:42:56 +0100 > > Alex Chapman wrote: > > > >> Hi Stephen, > >> > >> I have gone through your patch series and the hexdump option would be > >> quite valuable for use in DTS. > >> > >> However I am currently facing the issue of distinguishing noise packets > >> from intentional packets within the verbose output. Prior to your patch, > >> the intention was to use the Layer 4 port to distinguish between them, > >> however with the hexdump option, the plan is to now use a custom payload. > >> > >> The one issue is that with verbose level 5 does not print the required > >> RSS hash and RSS queue information. > > > > The queue is there, in the output. Not sure if the hash matters. > > I wanted to keep to tshark format as much as possible. > > > > We appreciate that but the RSS info is valuable to us. Seeing as > different enum values offer different info rather than different levels, > maybe we could change the enum to flags See new patch series, it also has JSON output.