From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFF9245A97; Thu, 3 Oct 2024 21:12:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3918F40289; Thu, 3 Oct 2024 21:12:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pg1-f182.google.com (mail-pg1-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFBC740156 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2024 21:12:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pg1-f182.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-7d7a9200947so854259a12.3 for ; Thu, 03 Oct 2024 12:12:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1727982760; x=1728587560; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=iVx9ZdBCo7BvbGQ1Ww+p5aBljcwKWujJAbjesFpiDcc=; b=U6iIHyDNTI+XSQC+/A611DcXu//9/QG6bgrje2pwEYLl+fLgWeHPYDK0IMgldTLnjV DKRBcNUBv2SjuL3EDaKlWbwpAbtMgp9wtCXFQqhFJKUSGAP+guw9GJXF0fuKLwmJ6Wjr sOcDah7Zx3OJJBjXW+NtZszg6UZ0UMajNR9PnaHXQQEPuFlZs7r591h3LEQjkqfI8deC 3N+aeP4a0q2jGzLygFtz7YedAoVqHmnXcPt0iZRIpRoa2J7OkjSjjoCSrAB0CrY94RPz NI6sdYd/xQ9uvLVRv4THcq12QLsUJSYUV21uXPpjFeRE8855oa7e1XoyPpjNwLvSgTMP 85mg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1727982760; x=1728587560; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=iVx9ZdBCo7BvbGQ1Ww+p5aBljcwKWujJAbjesFpiDcc=; b=wHnwuXnSLbXJd5nNx1tB5FsFCBJdxwkwajwgAPKQJvqaFx7on2HXopyuLAxTv8eQcu 6bFFgJH60k2t+ZDv/qP84cS+WzbuD5At3mVX6j5cNL3lpwYktmmXcdeHQ9Y43TMeqcNt L48Jn9Q11j8hc/sdALiMd2UD1a1U6+3q5ywTAWBatokW3J1u7JQr2GZusTHU71IQh5Ww N0c4e1cIT9e2KD1EqpjX7PDUEt0envr/wbUXL3lnxC7qHKlOB0sCUbITI4rLZNWYo/gD vygK4xLMHS1ZiVO9otmUHe1Mb/pR6pQMDWZK7WyNnEzi7FThhogk09t31V9tEpD7d147 046g== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXe3vVWyfPMD9210kBZuyjyP7A4JtuHM8BFbA0ae3EKJz4+GljpoxNatc3f8+6VHhDIJ6A=@dpdk.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwO/ZU3q0yLXts3T1anM50ST6j51dLHausq9KA9YJpurwpQw8oi pFZTxxmev38mBY6YQ/IWYSkof2BsTgqZvTcTgM9GqGTHgAWfpQenUuYEtjF4i44= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHu/vxHpj6vVwQ0gSJturGokpoApr6oRIcMIXj90lbMZv2sMtZs/fixDJ08GpY/aHBCnfu4FQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:3414:b0:1d2:e94d:45a6 with SMTP id adf61e73a8af0-1d6dfa3a877mr455353637.14.1727982760689; Thu, 03 Oct 2024 12:12:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-96-226.wavecable.com. [204.195.96.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 41be03b00d2f7-7e9dcb5da91sm1050081a12.91.2024.10.03.12.12.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 03 Oct 2024 12:12:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 12:12:36 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: Thomas Monjalon , Ajit Khaparde , dev@dpdk.org, Aman Singh , Yuying Zhang , Somnath Kotur , Nithin Dabilpuram , Kiran Kumar K , Sunil Kumar Kori , Satha Rao , Hemant Agrawal , Sachin Saxena , Simei Su , Wenjun Wu , Qi Zhang , Xiao Wang , Beilei Xing , Qiming Yang , Jiawen Wu , Jian Wang , david.marchand@redhat.com, Olivier MATZ Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: remove compile-time option for IEEE 1588 Message-ID: <20241003121236.5c56171d@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: References: <20230203132810.14187-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <3062773.CbtlEUcBR6@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:24:00 +0100 Ferruh Yigit wrote: > > :) remove compile flag in 24.11 LTS. > > > > But we may end up in same situation in 24.11, some drivers not being > > ready, so we should merge this patch very early in the 24.11 to give > > time to drivers to fix if they were not ready at that time. > > > > Other option is merge this patch in 24.07, so that vendors which were > > not ready can plan a fix for 24.11? Although enforcing an update by > > breaking the driver is not best planning, it may be an efficient one. > > > > Hi Thomas and et al. , > > Is is good time to merge this patch, there is enough time to fix > potential issues in this release, what do you think? Patch needs rebase if going into 24.11