DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
Cc: Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage <wathsala.vithanage@arm.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
	Dhruv Tripathi <Dhruv.Tripathi@arm.com>,
	Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
	"Varghese, Vipin" <Vipin.Varghese@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] ethdev: an API for cache stashing hints
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:52:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241004105226.6c2952be@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6ece19b1-be61-4eef-9a04-fc2bcff54bd8@amd.com>

On Sun, 22 Sep 2024 22:43:55 +0100
Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com> wrote:

> >>
> >> And I can see set() has two different APIs, 'rte_eth_dev_stashing_hints_rx' &
> >> 'rte_eth_dev_stashing_hints_tx', is there a reason to have two separate APIs
> >> instead of having one which gets RX & TX as argument, as done in internal
> >> device ops?  
> > 
> > Some types/hints may only apply to a single queue direction, so I thought it
> > would be better to separate them out into separate Rx and Tx APIs for ease
> > of comprehension/use for the developer.
> > In fact, underneath, it uses one API for both Rx and Tx.
> >   
> 
> Hi Wathsala,
> 
> Do you still pursue this RFC, should we expect a new version for this
> release?
> 
> Did you have any change to measure the impact of the changes in this patch?
> 
> 
> Btw, do you think the LLC aware lcore selection patch [1] can be
> relevant or can it help for the cases this patch addresses?


Don't think this is ready for 24.11 release. The patch fails multiple
tests, has some doc issues and would need more exmaples and support.

Since it requires an ABI change, if you want to pursue it further
send a new version and maybe it will be ready for next ABI breaking release 25.11.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-04 17:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-15 22:11 Wathsala Vithanage
2024-07-17  2:27 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-07-18 18:48   ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2024-07-20  3:05   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2024-07-17 10:32 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2024-07-22 11:18 ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-07-26 20:01   ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2024-09-22 21:43     ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-10-04 17:52       ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2024-10-04 18:46         ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241004105226.6c2952be@hermes.local \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=Dhruv.Tripathi@arm.com \
    --cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=Vipin.Varghese@amd.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=wathsala.vithanage@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).