DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] devtools: add tracepoint check in checkpatch
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 17:40:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241007174049.30e25d59@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BY1PR18MB6109226C644CB5A7215695BFDDA32@BY1PR18MB6109.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>

On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 12:09:53 +0000
Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com> wrote:

> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>
> >Sent: Friday, December 15, 2023 12:14 PM
> >To: dev@dpdk.org
> >Cc: thomas@monjalon.net; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>;
> >Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>
> >Subject: [PATCH v6 0/2] devtools: add tracepoint check in checkpatch
> >
> >This patch series adds a validation in checkpatch tool to check if tracepoint is
> >present in any new function added in ethdev, eventdev cryptodev and
> >mempool library.  
> 
> Please let me know if this patch series can be merged in DPDK or if there are any comments.

Not sure why the patch got ignored.
Perhaps if check-tracepoint was run first against existing code; add to check-patch later.

And the skip list is empty, is that right? is all of existing cryptodev ethdev ... ok now?

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-08  0:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-12  9:23 [PATCH] " Ankur Dwivedi
2022-10-12 11:45 ` [PATCH v2] " Ankur Dwivedi
2022-10-12 13:08   ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-10-12 15:16     ` [EXT] " Ankur Dwivedi
2022-10-12 16:19       ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-10-15 12:58   ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Ankur Dwivedi
2022-10-15 12:58     ` [PATCH v3 1/2] devtools: move build symbol map function Ankur Dwivedi
2022-10-15 12:58     ` [PATCH v3 2/2] devtools: add tracepoint check in checkpatch Ankur Dwivedi
2022-11-02  4:08     ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-03-03 15:58     ` [PATCH v4 " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-03-03 15:58       ` [PATCH v4 1/2] devtools: move build symbol map function Ankur Dwivedi
2023-03-03 15:58       ` [PATCH v4 2/2] devtools: add tracepoint check in checkpatch Ankur Dwivedi
2023-03-07 12:05       ` [PATCH v5 0/1] " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-03-07 12:05         ` [PATCH v5 1/1] " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-05-18 13:45           ` Ankur Dwivedi
2023-05-18 15:33             ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-08-21 13:53               ` [EXT] " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-08-21 14:46                 ` Morten Brørup
2023-08-30 16:23                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-08-30 18:38                     ` Morten Brørup
2023-09-01  2:32                       ` Jerin Jacob
2023-09-01  7:28                         ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-11-14 13:15                           ` Ankur Dwivedi
2023-11-28 13:18         ` [PATCH v5 0/1] " Thomas Monjalon
2023-11-28 14:07           ` [EXT] " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-11-28 15:55             ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-11-30  5:56               ` Ankur Dwivedi
2023-11-30  8:40                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-11-30 13:16                   ` Ankur Dwivedi
2023-12-15  6:43         ` [PATCH v6 0/2] " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-12-15  6:43           ` [PATCH v6 1/2] devtools: move build map changes function Ankur Dwivedi
2023-12-15  6:43           ` [PATCH v6 2/2] devtools: add tracepoint check in checkpatch Ankur Dwivedi
2024-07-17 12:09           ` [PATCH v6 0/2] " Ankur Dwivedi
2024-10-08  0:40             ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2024-10-09  6:03               ` [EXTERNAL] " Ankur Dwivedi
2024-10-09 15:05                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-10-21 14:06                   ` Ankur Dwivedi
2024-11-05  7:06                     ` Ankur Dwivedi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241007174049.30e25d59@hermes.local \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=adwivedi@marvell.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).