From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA2E245ADB; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 02:40:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 695694027C; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 02:40:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pl1-f176.google.com (mail-pl1-f176.google.com [209.85.214.176]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1945400D7 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 02:40:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pl1-f176.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-20c58e5e800so43935ad.1 for ; Mon, 07 Oct 2024 17:40:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1728348052; x=1728952852; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=/i92vwrfmkHZurj9jeIPacll5ZZ25LXWKAvpwWSvLhU=; b=DvjMK50GQtVX+8Wqga8aiad3hbo9LqKF0zvKQjRfszwQEGACfe9tQKx8T/z98mYiOr L+SpXa3L/VHWcZIBoZlgDpHS+1Vf1XRkzorv1rXHRVfAWTbUIBNKovFSZHjWMp7qtc1S BJA1vlq0WgsqVHVSPUPDu0CiRt05caA7gv+J+QXA8Rq7l7s9bivxsnmCT4+lFZbv1IuB 6P4iszE2BO1zRg/nS6Z0qtXEoPAH+x4d+mqXjJH8Ivzx4RXsj1Dsx9fw/Dp+jvINLJoA AU3gCO8/wwnpQ/xgqOCVeZIT/kJegSJAgQgjw99UY3TLzVoWao3EzHqzy57SGFRwW/sq vjkA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1728348052; x=1728952852; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=/i92vwrfmkHZurj9jeIPacll5ZZ25LXWKAvpwWSvLhU=; b=fOReT2VhBFlaQW052SGz2swSjpk3uNtVWfzmnxYEEbLu9CJ5iQ/KkGdOmAZ6Z9dlTh lfwzaWRYgbaa0Jx9Oo7ic+mevLQeLAwBhyP+Z+ewmqiKE98arSrMmaXfm5LTitcRCM3D BoAazfAmjMXh7QKeuxRQSEmT6X0Ter2vG2DvBx8OGli2s2LReazwl47CPk0ruBU9iCpa mlFSg25OzF1CU0gVrGqQIqkEVSEBJdTty7JjT4Dpc1IHMIl8Baw2wmlSw24dmFAxzQH1 aUj1Pg/hRU1no4QhoBqLJWpX8m/dDUNZUYx3mJJ7e6Hs7p0rLHO8r5ZsczSGaaUA+5zY y/oQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxjS+PQiTVEFPRmTcbi0/lhaN9u6oUpBgL994f3JxljaffsxWiX 9M1Z9r3elfpWSv7EvRU/+aFv/qPbbeInm4ZLBYD/KSZ12uQwX/zFNRwgkf4GzGA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFEBgl1oiA/t9qpFypN3UKEAvftQ7oLzfcPZoTyjm1w2JUovkEu+GnzqS6GAxqHe8b0JvXSFg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:4bc3:b0:2d8:b043:9414 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2e27df23564mr2526685a91.18.1728348051983; Mon, 07 Oct 2024 17:40:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-96-226.wavecable.com. [204.195.96.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-2e20b0f7690sm6152482a91.42.2024.10.07.17.40.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 07 Oct 2024 17:40:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 17:40:49 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Ankur Dwivedi Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "thomas@monjalon.net" , Jerin Jacob Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] devtools: add tracepoint check in checkpatch Message-ID: <20241007174049.30e25d59@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: References: <20230307120514.2774917-1-adwivedi@marvell.com> <20231215064355.1429709-1-adwivedi@marvell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 12:09:53 +0000 Ankur Dwivedi wrote: > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Ankur Dwivedi > >Sent: Friday, December 15, 2023 12:14 PM > >To: dev@dpdk.org > >Cc: thomas@monjalon.net; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran ; > >Ankur Dwivedi > >Subject: [PATCH v6 0/2] devtools: add tracepoint check in checkpatch > > > >This patch series adds a validation in checkpatch tool to check if tracepoint is > >present in any new function added in ethdev, eventdev cryptodev and > >mempool library. > > Please let me know if this patch series can be merged in DPDK or if there are any comments. Not sure why the patch got ignored. Perhaps if check-tracepoint was run first against existing code; add to check-patch later. And the skip list is empty, is that right? is all of existing cryptodev ethdev ... ok now?