From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 039F545B44; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 18:21:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D13864029C; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 18:21:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pl1-f177.google.com (mail-pl1-f177.google.com [209.85.214.177]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6CB8400D6 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 18:21:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pl1-f177.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-20c803787abso121425ad.0 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 09:21:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1729009294; x=1729614094; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=q6yxr6NTADoTZ6tfTb5MPuqC2k5kR/5PV69qLJA/T/U=; b=EHJ7Ky6NlyDElMGz/SEHWRYecNUNmB5nZG0zo+enynfwvC7lbC/wqwe61eWzTIKI6f 09kmKy2XWqFzQ1K8oUuh5W8cFj+pIgwZKcvsGCZxL20rK/z7tJjTRhZYe14JBipKoewc X2QPi4bm/bYmxIRyYSzMGtq3DP65hiLBNhTwlUTPuxYTyZaL2/IKxO6b0ohZMrhDWycd ubtEiv7xmAGePik2g8L0d1x5hcIj5VvKb00oxqvlp/BN3M4+uoABbf2ztEpKskm6KHTm /3krz+vvHvGJTgrJb0e2xtwm47FRLZb+ngNA888OILd3b+JMdUl0ZAN4hXmqRaQhQPg7 BUgg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1729009294; x=1729614094; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=q6yxr6NTADoTZ6tfTb5MPuqC2k5kR/5PV69qLJA/T/U=; b=EJjlQpQVbM4zuxTMCyOED1tzuNOybKrtLXTKZAweQAW7NhAgqaxHePpTaI9Yr0ydc3 ileGtELYtlZILJ/cTOZUIcsxnYffDO9bf51ttghINTo0LyJb6Jo+NaH3+RKrb+oakWf1 850Q9C9F4xHn2GIWdaJ1Ukrp5n2ZUlcFEj08TjPVZ/8OmWqN2gNUM6PasW9z+InLPooz rdZwSgCzMZBmRYqSBRnsAJKyC/rsPNaXjubfZFFvDCOVKfo507iwrf1bWHIWiPZaIWyA aomHcrMLVziABMP4xbRbb7zoGA0Pl0LZs23ab349ceZAceWIuxjnU4kVQ5/1lzktKUcl uamw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxkfalqLb18ix4LspejZMGMf9Efac8uuVrltGv0zT2jQED+KI1/ MnthUQ3CT1uOsJu/kEcGJwOL1Zk6QwMaMeWtMZknMCikKyZvaAtSm6+iRxKPmjs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEYS+CUddwkZroHsmGNxynI+JM+Z1LCEwnoE7XHxbqGv09ArVw02cUuSBWxvS8UWAVrVKdODA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e9d2:b0:20c:ad30:c891 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-20d26fb865fmr15017875ad.10.1729009293830; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 09:21:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-96-226.wavecable.com. [204.195.96.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 41be03b00d2f7-7ea9c7161ccsm1523564a12.92.2024.10.15.09.21.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 15 Oct 2024 09:21:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 09:21:31 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> To: Mingjin Ye <mingjinx.ye@intel.com> Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] test: fix option devices Message-ID: <20241015092131.57a04d1d@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: <20241014100026.1517769-1-mingjinx.ye@intel.com> References: <20241012093519.1500942-1-mingjinx.ye@intel.com> <20241014100026.1517769-1-mingjinx.ye@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:00:26 +0000 Mingjin Ye <mingjinx.ye@intel.com> wrote: > Without using allow (-a) or block (-b), EAL loads all devices by default. > Unexpected devices may be loaded when running test cases in sub-processes. > > This patch fixes the issue by copying the parameters of the master process > if the allow (-a) or block (-b) option is not used when starting the child > process. Should be described as primary process, not master process. That is also causing the checkpatch warning.