From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F8E445B44;
	Wed, 16 Oct 2024 00:29:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0860040144;
	Wed, 16 Oct 2024 00:29:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-pf1-f172.google.com (mail-pf1-f172.google.com
 [209.85.210.172])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCED0400D7
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 16 Oct 2024 00:29:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-pf1-f172.google.com with SMTP id
 d2e1a72fcca58-71e5b2814f6so2464960b3a.2
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 15:29:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1729031387;
 x=1729636187; darn=dpdk.org; 
 h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to
 :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date
 :message-id:reply-to;
 bh=Ueb68O7TjaYuZmjLaUvm/UYWSbgLWn6M5pLoWneP6BI=;
 b=ytwcNxUEhCdtdZSaCatA+IlAiSHGrysajNkOZFhmxMBG+vanM+QFVqR4NKrD2PyNWn
 LKVsAV8W8Q2Pbu94wXcZgwCRmVG80ZAwYJru7WJ++a6vNk7DwBOZZGOppSHHqS2Kgj7i
 75JQwmK7CUoBOUdnNXd7mrT17ENjJ7DU5bMF7cG17d1iSGjZ6zstJ7NL9/sJBmaBibDj
 69PDjdJrRYI0J7o6xwymnGt49fYT/SC5q5lXd6VVp92WR+LRvBegMW3ptR6I8tMExuTb
 6uD6I4DbrXT6TlYmcfxxbYc3Rw7V549mCIzI2XOufXr0A5Ny4HJwfCiLui6A/o+zUzvr
 jJfA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1729031387; x=1729636187;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to
 :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
 :subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=Ueb68O7TjaYuZmjLaUvm/UYWSbgLWn6M5pLoWneP6BI=;
 b=lDrpaDYLY6i1o/A7wK2D6K211QuO07F18bixuK6h5GCwG30u4fd5GeanxjxNE4xDxX
 dxSVWYOoHaG4V8CDe2na81B4jbhl3hzbzA3Ka7lGO0xaeuXOoqDXsos1fwTQWAChvVtg
 SyxxViRakwHvYi124+Io7SJUkyLlElHnN9NJ9F4yozL5M0Kl9w+UNVUZOxE2IfzIX17H
 qKyPryDFK7gUSr/1YQiz8DuHazLqjZnYWHZjm7q+aljXIDAxcqUnKH/MqE9oe5m6S4mc
 8VAVAPygdyXmMB++w0NNzz5WyJ/dYLsWM32IukYlcoadjo+dR1tjlaCMD/xV4irg+Dq4
 MHng==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzt5E7Tlc+uU6YTFiYwpjtoWFMZjPjDFJCI/c7i0o0Wu1s7Rovf
 XMi0AZ02X5COCcV500lvqcLvqlMJ/1IvQrCy4C64ZXjLeT9MXfAqi55yBc0DjZw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH/uCQQF4mRdHXsC3X7ODCvQ36iNuNreyhGejoUf72apnc3WzDwWLj9qee1+7hqLhnW4XYzfA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:1797:b0:71e:7c25:8217 with SMTP id
 d2e1a72fcca58-71e7c2591demr3389357b3a.25.1729031387655; 
 Tue, 15 Oct 2024 15:29:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hermes.local (204-195-96-226.wavecable.com. [204.195.96.226])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 d2e1a72fcca58-71e774a29e0sm1838699b3a.126.2024.10.15.15.29.47
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Tue, 15 Oct 2024 15:29:47 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 15:29:45 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Yipeng Wang <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>, Sameh Gobriel
 <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>, Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] hash: add dynamic polynomial calculation
Message-ID: <20241015152945.530926a1@hermes.local>
In-Reply-To: <20241011181703.236985-3-vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
References: <20241010123331.749004-1-vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
 <20241011181703.236985-1-vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
 <20241011181703.236985-3-vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org

On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 18:17:00 +0000
Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com> wrote:

> +
> +uint32_t
> +rte_thash_get_rand_poly(uint32_t poly_degree)
> +{
> +	uint32_t ret_poly;
> +
> +	if (poly_degree > 32)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	do
> +		ret_poly = __thash_get_rand_poly(poly_degree);
> +	while (thash_test_poly_order(ret_poly, poly_degree));

Unbounded loop adds some risk, should there be an upper limit on retries.

> +
> +	return ret_poly;
> +}
> diff --git a/lib/hash/version.map b/lib/hash/version.map
> index 4f13f1d5aa..7ce6ab1121 100644
> --- a/lib/hash/version.map
> +++ b/lib/hash/version.map
> @@ -61,4 +61,5 @@ INTERNAL {
>  
>  	rte_thash_gfni_stub;
>  	rte_thash_gfni_bulk_stub;
> +	rte_thash_get_rand_poly;

Why does this function need to be moved to its own file?
Only used in one place in rte_thash.c.