From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4382945B55;
	Wed, 16 Oct 2024 20:42:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10A264021F;
	Wed, 16 Oct 2024 20:42:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.11])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB83340144
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 16 Oct 2024 20:42:15 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;
 d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel;
 t=1729104136; x=1760640136;
 h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:
 content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=cirf4gg8wMtuSpK3pspLwiaNGSeV66aZsQqZKddAnJ0=;
 b=d7ZPJTZ4RbvFosj4TR2w9HQyjOHRuou8iDFLMQRjxEkEj7Lg/wjJKe1l
 F+rDtkRjGq0pEno/OmYfxcdhl7k1XLFpJvPbJRRa0a9zkXorhHTAfOE7L
 t+A48Vykelox6SohMonaYP+gqJUHltrr8HTMVMkPzEgRMdzwjucCLVcE1
 NryzmWjBaAbLfKXWBI0l0PiLduokQHG9SRbZi8eESQ61Id9nbEu3SoDI+
 WxcPqAJGsRWIonL7QKFmg8QUIOz1vGwtkY4qhrRKUub0+rJzK9tUrifs9
 c0dPnBQANj/opiJcpeIICXmyRV0sxbynXtHtjcJuOP8tVCa1GJwQ44fbx A==;
X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: GC3BxoywQ7ieOOZb4c68KA==
X-CSE-MsgGUID: S9exCGldTNGNi/z8WuItgA==
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11226"; a="39148176"
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,208,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="39148176"
Received: from orviesa001.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.141])
 by fmvoesa105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384;
 16 Oct 2024 11:42:14 -0700
X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ePSUEy8XQ7K731oqt5DNnA==
X-CSE-MsgGUID: LcxAZWw/Q82nwIIdRYkhFw==
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,208,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="115756432"
Received: from unknown (HELO silpixa00401176.ir.intel.com) ([10.243.22.76])
 by orviesa001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Oct 2024 11:42:13 -0700
From: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: david.marchand@redhat.com,
	stephen@networkplumber.org
Subject: [PATCH] test/fib: clarify FIB RCU negative tests
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 18:42:09 +0000
Message-ID: <20241016184209.802449-1-vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org

Add additional negative tests for rte_fib_rcu_qsbr_add().
Also explicitly check returned codes.
Additionally add a check into the rte_fib_rcu_qsbr_add()
for passed fib argument.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
---
 app/test/test_fib.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
 lib/fib/rte_fib.c   |  3 +++
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_fib.c b/app/test/test_fib.c
index 15035ee045..52908588e6 100644
--- a/app/test/test_fib.c
+++ b/app/test/test_fib.c
@@ -400,7 +400,6 @@ test_invalid_rcu(void)
 	config.max_routes = MAX_ROUTES;
 	config.rib_ext_sz = 0;
 	config.default_nh = def_nh;
-	config.type = RTE_FIB_DUMMY;
 
 	fib = rte_fib_create(__func__, SOCKET_ID_ANY, &config);
 	RTE_TEST_ASSERT(fib != NULL, "Failed to create FIB\n");
@@ -417,23 +416,33 @@ test_invalid_rcu(void)
 	rcu_cfg.v = qsv;
 
 	/* adding rcu to RTE_FIB_DUMMY FIB type */
+	config.type = RTE_FIB_DUMMY;
 	rcu_cfg.mode = RTE_FIB_QSBR_MODE_SYNC;
 	status = rte_fib_rcu_qsbr_add(fib, &rcu_cfg);
-	RTE_TEST_ASSERT(status == -ENOTSUP, "rte_fib_rcu_qsbr_add returned wrong error status\n");
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT(status == -ENOTSUP,
+		"rte_fib_rcu_qsbr_add returned wrong error status when called with DUMMY type FIB\n");
 	rte_fib_free(fib);
 
-	/* Invalid QSBR mode */
 	config.type = RTE_FIB_DIR24_8;
 	config.dir24_8.nh_sz = RTE_FIB_DIR24_8_4B;
 	config.dir24_8.num_tbl8 = MAX_TBL8;
 	fib = rte_fib_create(__func__, SOCKET_ID_ANY, &config);
 	RTE_TEST_ASSERT(fib != NULL, "Failed to create FIB\n");
+
+	/* Call rte_fib_rcu_qsbr_add without fib or config */
+	status = rte_fib_rcu_qsbr_add(NULL, &rcu_cfg);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT(status == -EINVAL, "RCU added without fib\n");
+	status = rte_fib_rcu_qsbr_add(fib, NULL);
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT(status == -EINVAL, "RCU added without config\n");
+
+	/* Invalid QSBR mode */
 	rcu_cfg.mode = 2;
 	status = rte_fib_rcu_qsbr_add(fib, &rcu_cfg);
-	RTE_TEST_ASSERT(status != 0, "Failed to add RCU\n");
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT(status == -EINVAL, "RCU added with incorrect mode\n");
 
 	rcu_cfg.mode = RTE_FIB_QSBR_MODE_DQ;
-	/* Attach RCU QSBR to FIB */
+
+	/* Attach RCU QSBR to FIB to check for double attach */
 	status = rte_fib_rcu_qsbr_add(fib, &rcu_cfg);
 	RTE_TEST_ASSERT(status == 0, "Can not attach RCU to FIB\n");
 
@@ -445,7 +454,7 @@ test_invalid_rcu(void)
 	rcu_cfg.v = qsv2;
 	rcu_cfg.mode = RTE_FIB_QSBR_MODE_SYNC;
 	status = rte_fib_rcu_qsbr_add(fib, &rcu_cfg);
-	RTE_TEST_ASSERT(status != 0, "Secondary RCU was mistakenly attached\n");
+	RTE_TEST_ASSERT(status = -EEXIST, "Secondary RCU was mistakenly attached\n");
 
 	rte_fib_free(fib);
 	rte_free(qsv);
diff --git a/lib/fib/rte_fib.c b/lib/fib/rte_fib.c
index fa8779462a..db79fc428e 100644
--- a/lib/fib/rte_fib.c
+++ b/lib/fib/rte_fib.c
@@ -346,6 +346,9 @@ rte_fib_select_lookup(struct rte_fib *fib,
 int
 rte_fib_rcu_qsbr_add(struct rte_fib *fib, struct rte_fib_rcu_config *cfg)
 {
+	if (fib == NULL)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	switch (fib->type) {
 	case RTE_FIB_DIR24_8:
 		return dir24_8_rcu_qsbr_add(fib->dp, cfg, fib->name);
-- 
2.43.0