From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Chaoyong He <chaoyong.he@corigine.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
oss-drivers <oss-drivers@corigine.com>,
Long Wu <Long.Wu@nephogine.com>,
Nole Zhang <peng.zhang@corigine.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] net/bonding: add command to set dedicated queue size
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 08:00:43 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241204080043.2aa5e239@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SJ0PR13MB554500C363F7F2E4A4B8C5399E372@SJ0PR13MB5545.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 06:21:00 +0000
Chaoyong He <chaoyong.he@corigine.com> wrote:
> > The definition of what a "dedicated queue" is a bit confusing.
> > If it is only for LACP packets, it should never need to be very big.
> > Only under a mis-configuration and DoS kind of flood should there ever be
> > many packets.
>
> Yes, the dedicated queue is only for LACP packets now and it doesn't need be set very big.
>
> But if we use a hardware queue as the "dedicated queue", we must consider the hardware
> capability. The minimum queue size of some NICs may be larger than the hardcode dedicated
> queue size. In this case, I think it is better to add an interface to set the dedicated queue size.
How about using the existing descriptor queue limits api for that?
It is reported by info get
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-04 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-24 2:03 [PATCH 0/2] add function " Chaoyong He
2024-06-24 2:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] net/bonding: standard the log message Chaoyong He
2024-10-10 18:10 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-10-11 3:02 ` Chaoyong He
2024-06-24 2:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] net/bonding: add command to set dedicated queue size Chaoyong He
2024-10-10 18:13 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-10-11 3:00 ` Chaoyong He
2024-10-11 3:24 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] add function " Chaoyong He
2024-10-11 3:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] net/bonding: standard the log message Chaoyong He
2024-10-11 5:10 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-10-29 1:51 ` lihuisong (C)
2024-10-11 3:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] net/bonding: add command to set dedicated queue size Chaoyong He
2024-10-17 16:05 ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-10-29 1:49 ` lihuisong (C)
2024-12-03 18:39 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-12-03 19:57 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-12-04 6:21 ` Chaoyong He
2024-12-04 16:00 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2024-12-05 2:53 ` Chaoyong He
2024-12-19 5:52 ` Chaoyong He
2024-12-25 21:22 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-12-20 5:25 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-12-26 1:26 ` [PATCH v3] net/bonding: fix dedicated queue setup failed Chaoyong He
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241204080043.2aa5e239@hermes.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=Long.Wu@nephogine.com \
--cc=chaoyong.he@corigine.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=oss-drivers@corigine.com \
--cc=peng.zhang@corigine.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).