From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA4146190; Tue, 4 Feb 2025 17:27:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FE164042E; Tue, 4 Feb 2025 17:27:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from linux.microsoft.com (linux.microsoft.com [13.77.154.182]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDFE3400EF; Tue, 4 Feb 2025 17:27:04 +0100 (CET) Received: by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1213) id 42C9A205491A; Tue, 4 Feb 2025 08:27:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com 42C9A205491A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1738686424; bh=d3+LTk2uYid/dyE1kMI90BRxXqfFmWS11tAV5qfBJXQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=gj+bhyaa8n9yGWifY717w7W5GQ9Su5f0KIcBYF85sswLWybYYY+JOUUqLeStyc2ax 12RNMV8EuelJRSuuy5rh+mcew7SfPAiUxgLWBsNh8VbN8yl37Qk46yTlEVyM4biUQo Dp1NJSqpiehCYmfu5HlP8nvzemeL932vnwXydgVc= Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 08:27:04 -0800 From: Andre Muezerie To: Patrick Robb Cc: David Marchand , dev@dpdk.org, konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com, thomas@monjalon.net, ci@dpdk.org, Aaron Conole , Cody Cheng Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 00/27] remove use of VLAs for Windows Message-ID: <20250204162704.GA16594@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> References: <1713397319-26135-1-git-send-email-roretzla@linux.microsoft.com> <1738555590-12753-1-git-send-email-andremue@linux.microsoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 10:38:55AM -0500, Patrick Robb wrote: > It looks like this failed the check-meson script which we incorporated into > our apply/build pipeline recently, which is why this series got a "build > failure." It is indicating there are issues with lib/vhost/meson.build > and app/test/meson.build. > > Obviously we need to provide an email body which makes clear that > check-meson was the source of the failure, and I have a UNH Lab ticket for > this. > > Running Check Meson > Error: Incorrect indent at app/test/meson.build:257 > Error: Incorrect indent at app/test/meson.build:258 > Error: Incorrect indent at lib/vhost/meson.build:23 > Error: Incorrect indent at lib/vhost/meson.build:24 Thanks for clarifying that Patrick. I submitted v20 for this series fixing the errors above. -- Andre Muezerie