From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85ECF4619F; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 17:43:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52432402EE; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 17:43:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pl1-f169.google.com (mail-pl1-f169.google.com [209.85.214.169]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50CF640289 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 17:43:51 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pl1-f169.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-21f2f09865bso145795ad.0 for ; Wed, 05 Feb 2025 08:43:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1738773830; x=1739378630; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=FFzU73GA0BBUCP57hqUZILqJbhWk+5QCNEAvJa97ilA=; b=Eii12xrh4uBLLUgT4OD1yOK8fr5AjISPiU4zP8pXEVzVpzqdtbgmhDnu/XEv46EHZK ARQeNFLVqdXVL05BOKSnxPCh/hWoXfSooTbNgxXQJiGkxW/jgI9mdeh3T3/2m0Z7H8ev UQ7OQhShYzTLX7KRcUNErM3d/LedXmTAwIy/M3IrsVmcx1+7lkTrbx0h6/w2NiAy/XOE DSX/AnD2PLtVcc3GL8JNqW/nBxdcZ8HcLoyIDYRXkDPNnlsuOt/5GH4Ybp4PY16dyqw+ NY7XZ7bxcS54cKvYlxZK1XJcJAcZOJHvCHbjMeUV7rv3DtVrscNp1tpRV6fOibaXOSw+ 2wsA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1738773830; x=1739378630; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=FFzU73GA0BBUCP57hqUZILqJbhWk+5QCNEAvJa97ilA=; b=X3ujIUc9oeftjdYzZ2tU+/L9Eh4feGCi4MmhmA4R9H/xivsIaSH2if6BCnNmY4Tcl/ RUdB8QD+slgjxMn5kSQHXphWkirs3eZNzrdtOXQ+Uka1/+DBfVZwlNAuJCxsRsvyJSI/ PztS+1RPm0PXbd6gK1UAFeeIvB9MR1WFgKW5qTaJqfocCu0LVSJVzPUgNHR/hWH1bGf9 iyhzkgmCxr7Z/tZGxVcS2nBsJ51JejE2Qw8ZT8D3j4DQwClo6B3kOXAGUip6suWKcPcQ n3gigrjP/xXLOyRxSFW+3iAKpQMkRMvH9lrLt5Mry4CcGlgO/xPU+XlMxT2W8e+AM6C/ CoXg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw6+IQWtWlLuQbubQ+gfEfgWoH/1OYRZhVNGSx/ay/CG/Ml5RcA 9qONwadJbqGb2TVyEfFx9Xg4nOsqwV29lMla9Tifvpg7ywdpl8wsbx2Sn4GJ/80= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsl6SGyU96wF+NpqsVljX6kxkZEHpg7MhfAuMzUXjnFX3n9/pB/LSz57+94a9D HdST2mqcvLxIMIckokMd7rwebk13eqJ6rW5fq5EvArTWU7OCZnF8gKAOhZLABsOTc6FCF7z7jyI wmcfFRCr5atE10W5vih5IcmZfBN6Pk+fxJK3oJmidgZ089RBuqPfRBtVMqRsyrJ0fXMXe7yu3ID RKYvApYcvKg3/pTQS9RL3JY00Zr/8EbeD8kt5OxjPiBbtGe1eValfHp4drfoa2eRkh61iQJE5Ld BZhAQfS78Var76r+3BTMicXTdnvugQbLySlalXRmCQSE92Aoy+TGxfl3EPCNKptfDE7U X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHV1RZM06cUJdhixiVhFsRUV5hvSVB4UBQ2d8sohuHtpPNKtXs99ZmhSGWVXOFla6pO9ZhMEg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:23ce:b0:729:1c0f:b94e with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-730423f6897mr268912b3a.6.1738773830419; Wed, 05 Feb 2025 08:43:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-96-226.wavecable.com. [204.195.96.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-72fe69ba353sm12572993b3a.112.2025.02.05.08.43.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 05 Feb 2025 08:43:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 08:43:48 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Andre Muezerie Cc: dev@dpdk.org, konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com, thomas@monjalon.net, david.marchand@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v21 18/27] test: remove use of VLAs for Windows built code in bitset tests Message-ID: <20250205084348.29f960ce@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: <1738702638-22363-19-git-send-email-andremue@linux.microsoft.com> References: <1713397319-26135-1-git-send-email-roretzla@linux.microsoft.com> <1738702638-22363-1-git-send-email-andremue@linux.microsoft.com> <1738702638-22363-19-git-send-email-andremue@linux.microsoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 12:57:09 -0800 Andre Muezerie wrote: > +#if defined(RTE_TOOLCHAIN_GCC) && (GCC_VERSION >= 110000) > +#pragma GCC diagnostic push > +#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Warray-bounds" > +#endif > > + /* gcc is giving false positives here when code is optimized */ > rte_bitset_copy(reference, bitset, size); > > +#if defined(RTE_TOOLCHAIN_GCC) && (GCC_VERSION >= 110000) > +#pragma GCC diagnostic pop > +#endif > + > Any change requiring pragma workaround is suspect. What happens with Gcc 15? and ASAN