From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ACEA461AE; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 19:24:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C4EC402E8; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 19:24:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pj1-f52.google.com (mail-pj1-f52.google.com [209.85.216.52]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61748402E5 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 19:24:06 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pj1-f52.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2f9d3d0f55dso7273080a91.1 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 10:24:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1739211845; x=1739816645; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=ZNUsqIqt7Uo6WGWMoMt/X/mG8b2IRP0ZwascG6bpI40=; b=aR3HgWe1KqD5Rd71Bkv4c2WKzLXZKcmcvQzMNe8pKpf3f6z0Inz0GI8oVs1VfN/oH0 E79+XDOtZ0QzYq3T2QSKk7f3vBpKVSPjKbgbMI8odHt++MO+lJ/mXpGCESGtaY9pCZOw hixOjQBiY/3M1b1KLFCMtYgeKt8NFbXjg6PG/Lx5UrGqHZ6wFAYP2qOUtjhShFiBR6L0 KPkRQ+02DkYhaaB8DQCOTOSMSEbkFT+9i5M15DNfLMSbE5+LUFpJ0PWtT25PZAmuTbWV g2H5Tj8B3R3eDcNa8aBmJ3bTcxnlL/9mOHaelXp/tbDtOv/xDkpnr3LrzGh0fdsudgtn dshw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1739211845; x=1739816645; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ZNUsqIqt7Uo6WGWMoMt/X/mG8b2IRP0ZwascG6bpI40=; b=K905qmg45kA1IJWZs1eq6Gf0K/+cnONd/TCqHLk3CCagbrGP5CEAhxxHgCLilpDBUv elv5NQokfDN3nzHbhuche0dWIaYQfC6XJ2a2ZlsSP5+iGLoFr+fsouFms9kGEC0aoFqm H/c1BHVLmT+ZOhzN3LCm346V/V6EsghDV0flWXKyASuRbwuKv9CxVVVaZPBsgoNpkjOm yQ5L02W/NZnFjpxLassZ2E0HcG+xoHPcOX/759Jh+TDwR6JnJEHBcOcNOE85Wo2wJH97 eZoMBYm43Qx66uJtTAt/3M8CrAMqD5Cy0t/zURHVzrITaN2c1vfhOZ/b1r+Y+zSZ+BM/ 2qVw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyrHpDEtU8BuxlkbJQfTH2cSf7cR4MlxMbcgmmaXP4Y9fk1StwD xEVonCHhivVZm7dOwOJ4cYrFBgpyyYFwl/ymizSsZqhspPaKk93fKCrpZlgk4V8= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctJMhCWs8BltWFXaOlEYx1CJyeAfUOUKh6BCgVFiwVKojZfKBoLJDgor6hnQKA VsylDdPlBwS9RdVGD3UV7ZP3c12vnknvS0U3xWwu+55RSdVOar7Nnb/0JYfmcj+g3OxZOwS4Ar7 lljMAL3an+A4PYPX4rWNsZ/tveOxDFAO172d5X2gy6nuK+7+/iXhX4VDxsvA5hUjt2puV+S4/qK 1kaxPFeR/LquYTPYlFPRSnrLd8NQ81RiVrPJo1gCOtEE28goHCItcBVqRTYH4jXMjiobxSX8M/N DWstbZvSZraXALESaa32ey+bqqkh9Uz3y8G2DjBVH1WG+nh1X8Ibs5XfmMcL1gpLRc1K X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEv9Xg/9Dxnu9LaZzXNOIUy7CZj25IlJaYVE3yC3jh8SvfUmtxVWcO8tneAqYVfjjPJq7Nijw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3143:b0:2ee:c918:cd60 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2fa241776f8mr22197542a91.20.1739211845599; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 10:24:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-96-226.wavecable.com. [204.195.96.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-2fa42dde5e5sm5519217a91.3.2025.02.10.10.24.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 10 Feb 2025 10:24:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 09:36:26 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Bingbin Chen Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 08/14] net/zxdh: support hash resources configuration Message-ID: <20250210093626.57c76e6e@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: <20250210015017.4105624-3-chen.bingbin@zte.com.cn> References: <20250210014441.4105335-1-chen.bingbin@zte.com.cn> <20250210015017.4105624-1-chen.bingbin@zte.com.cn> <20250210015017.4105624-3-chen.bingbin@zte.com.cn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 09:50:11 +0800 Bingbin Chen wrote: > +static uint16_t g_lpm_crc[ZXDH_SE_ZBLK_NUM] = { > + 0x1021, 0x8005, 0x3D65, 0xab47, 0x3453, 0x0357, 0x0589, 0xa02b, > + 0x1021, 0x8005, 0x3D65, 0xab47, 0x3453, 0x0357, 0x0589, 0xa02b, > + 0x1021, 0x8005, 0x3D65, 0xab47, 0x3453, 0x0357, 0x0589, 0xa02b, > + 0x1021, 0x8005, 0x3D65, 0xab47, 0x3453, 0x0357, 0x0589, 0xa02b > +}; > +uint32_t g_hash_zblk_idx[ZXDH_DEV_CHANNEL_MAX] > + [ZXDH_HASH_FUNC_ID_NUM] > + [ZXDH_HASH_TBL_ID_NUM] = {0}; > +static uint32_t g_ddr_hash_arg[ZXDH_HASH_DDR_CRC_NUM] = { > + 0x04C11DB7, > + 0xF4ACFB13, > + 0x20044009, > + 0x00210801 > +}; CRC tables should be const?