From: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, thomas@monjalon.net, bruce.richardson@intel.com,
Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>,
Jasvinder Singh <jasvinder.singh@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 1/2] eal: add new function versioning macros
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 07:45:43 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250306154543.GB28298@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250306125021.2231121-1-david.marchand@redhat.com>
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 01:50:20PM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
> For versioning symbols:
> - MSVC uses pragmas on the symbol,
> - GNU linker uses special asm directives,
>
> To accommodate both GNU linker and MSVC linker, introduce new macros for
> exporting and versioning symbols that will surround the whole function.
>
> This has the advantage of hiding all the ugly details in the macros.
> Now versioning a symbol is just a call to a single macro:
> - RTE_VERSION_SYMBOL (resp. RTE_VERSION_EXPERIMENTAL_SYMBOL), for
> keeping an old implementation code under a versioned function (resp.
> experimental function),
> - RTE_DEFAULT_SYMBOL, for declaring the new default versioned function,
> and handling the static link special case, instead of
> BIND_DEFAULT_SYMBOL + MAP_STATIC_SYMBOL,
>
> Documentation has been updated though it needs some polishing.
> The experimental macro has not been tested.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> ---
> Changes since RFC v1:
> - renamed and prefixed macros,
> - reindented in prevision of second patch,
>
> ---
> doc/guides/contributing/abi_versioning.rst | 130 ++++-----------------
> lib/eal/include/rte_function_versioning.h | 27 +++++
> lib/net/rte_net_crc.c | 30 ++---
> 3 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 130 deletions(-)
>
I like the proposal. Having a single macro able to handle different linkers
is clearly a good step forward.
Acked-by: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-06 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-05 21:23 [RFC] " David Marchand
2025-03-06 2:57 ` Patrick Robb
2025-03-06 10:23 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-03-06 12:50 ` [RFC v2 1/2] " David Marchand
2025-03-06 12:50 ` [RFC v2 2/2] build: generate symbol maps David Marchand
2025-03-06 15:45 ` Andre Muezerie [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250306154543.GB28298@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net \
--to=andremue@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jasvinder.singh@intel.com \
--cc=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).