From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1721646487; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 15:19:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86CBF4064E; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 15:19:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pj1-f51.google.com (mail-pj1-f51.google.com [209.85.216.51]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A309E402E0 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 15:19:04 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pj1-f51.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-3018e2d042bso8396456a91.2 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 07:19:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1742998744; x=1743603544; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=KbpwbYRA9a/QctFR6ZLhRf3FelU6Es3eJvlHLMfhJyk=; b=0VPKOLippeunQwWZSSmRrGT+kYdgXs4wqiuK874Mb1WYoMm0ayqjlvqqZqBJDL33ES hxefenm9+pP4bKIqjiAkk6klIAVqoVMZFE+LX6DQ98J01xpQD2TCw3VNVgqEp974Jljp 9ctfGdNpj6d7rLYWLD7wqeHvjuKyiuyDyxxjXihVjPeoLORlo/cHgDEKDjFVDgeAs/HE 391M9arf9UWGb4ApB4eOqiHFL5vTDkDba1JaIKTVONganv6qmb9DMFo9iRrvJyOqtSW0 1XgvvmudXTP/JhLatKcgK3ke/+92eRUPBsCUFWiyAboT1IMNWVU988eEtSSrf1W2wmTa mOGg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1742998744; x=1743603544; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=KbpwbYRA9a/QctFR6ZLhRf3FelU6Es3eJvlHLMfhJyk=; b=CIwXq/HP/o5z3BAxUWp1iXqYu7bI6D0iz9fz7baeFQuHqCkEB2BLH2kXKMQCChU2PF dMiOwIf+aiMJL0nNB6qfp0CyPZmzplcZ4aVO6z9CAEIn+gXiL8eZrmhon7hIrJ/XcNcU 89YZyz/6zi4ie70stFaXs+HsG27FZORKGy7hDLNieHsTN572lOiZF8/L6/2kY3nzP+ZW jWKDz6WOzp4lVPQdWQcr4Ujg2YwSOyW3jfOf6VFSc7B1KgpCOLqdisWqd94KWirIZXYY WLyleK1GwuzHXa3o6JP+GYhcOGb/TSh+P0P/hrLWIub61/jhi/kRC7IFjQXPCU4O4Izq LC5A== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCU2nOCySO2CRrR8PYa53IHAK8ObuLKgOmx4VL9Ih7iYQwlBv0NuOH3DGLlC2aRuhrDJ0Cg=@dpdk.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwuXTzbpl0vwCsc6XGNoPseMHTLveQ7xEjKkhm8GXhLCzT8StqZ 06yCDg2HxznnLsaB6wVS4qr3jTwoLdhAPdqCbGLsE1wwevrH4x4s2GafPFvP1PI= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncslAKhC7fBix8+xcRQRey7c5zXm0eVkqd7n9YJAg7DiUqBq9QjRzKJmPBSfw50 Dvd/pXSd+f3ib5l4wlF2Qu28a5ymBnf8KqTQv5OHnYcZY6V1/R+L2WhLmHo7/3pZN75VNMejAES l+aeFcqf13H2qCN6qAa6ncvXwPKyGuNNUeuDFkHVOkyswv9f0mf/cdfsVR/4NXZ6eAnTrfzzjfy 8WwBeDAVG/LT9YLaPw/H8Y16VD16xMw3wGE7tVWmuUooVTRagdJADJXRmXbRtzlxJXoN1XgUt1L SnzM6WmxVQGxXKaDkujCPnc1bSGy2AZla6ZxZY3cOiADvi08PEiK48qe0jMu2r7IBh4pvIsvFa8 MNDN0wqLoXJd82xCIeU1z X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGDTzxUU/Zbys30QfbtYsJ8NIs9Udy1cfJzysgXit9woaG5RyYHmH89WcSJm7Ig6ShDSng3BQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:a92:b0:1f5:6a1a:329b with SMTP id adf61e73a8af0-1fe4300f787mr42757683637.32.1742998743589; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 07:19:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-96-226.wavecable.com. [204.195.96.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 41be03b00d2f7-af8a23dc8e4sm11075315a12.0.2025.03.26.07.19.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 26 Mar 2025 07:19:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 07:18:57 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Cc: , Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] eventdev: add default software vector adapter Message-ID: <20250326071857.7ef4a050@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: <20250326131441.5965-3-pbhagavatula@marvell.com> References: <20250326131441.5965-1-pbhagavatula@marvell.com> <20250326131441.5965-3-pbhagavatula@marvell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 18:44:36 +0530 wrote: > +struct sw_vector_adapter_service_data { > + uint32_t service_id; > + RTE_ATOMIC(rte_mcslock_t *) lock; > + RTE_TAILQ_HEAD(, sw_vector_adapter_data) adapter_list; > +}; Why the indirect pointer to the lock? rather than embedding it in the structure?