From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83BCF46488; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 21:25:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 384634021F; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 21:25:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pj1-f43.google.com (mail-pj1-f43.google.com [209.85.216.43]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0691F40156 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 21:25:52 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pj1-f43.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-301a4d5156aso326526a91.1 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 13:25:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1743020752; x=1743625552; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=KwdwbatOBd6du6JgRaIH5lRUo6tm9bEfsSKesNL5w1E=; b=V2Ob/QkfTcYk/vnd66izmjoKu0H2OKXSg9J7qKfETCbp1ZCPBaz80CUbV1THIqZWD7 IO3i6yLrSsAPIUFL+jG0XGo25EgczQA5YcqgyId8ME/XATDGxALOeYF6xL69WLnECuLx QQ9wPWg0eZ52EykNCaBPKV11ZNdqoMjh4JQ0MIQYKJ10vbN/w5dzWloKC0pwj+IkvZpX lq8nvQgKE8a+27gHO5r2BEHMYP0/0QnFgQtLNk/zhsO41H71RgYIj43jFcDXEigb3FbM CZRLasqnWjCp/qckeEozvNGZc5S+gjjBpu+zD8PE2VsW23Ms7faKmQenzDl9Nt4NL1Z6 8nkw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1743020752; x=1743625552; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=KwdwbatOBd6du6JgRaIH5lRUo6tm9bEfsSKesNL5w1E=; b=mo5kw4d5MHwQf7iQ/0FwWgGB9agPpi80zdPrgG51EuJMtHE+nqrYKitrTZbNzgTchP C29GV8vO8NXy10VxdWY0ODvdDNBvM05hd4hiZ8DQa367cRLjvv93Qi6J923hGRs93hBx byVFzbuYdawz1k6f+V/GSyQWziwpmkD54qU8oAgSYAjpdujvnG4zTs96xrmpR0DiaxGn HvvhHkQicXZDNYm9EdmpSEZibial+5t1HXwGKvjrYOvv1fZt6lhH6ggse3CF+BAceqZp E5wxMQ2I33tvieCi2yYOUuGEtLqKCbzaPjAdmeGdQCy0cWaqfN5K7+f1CUIszwpj1si0 C1xg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXJzjhewyobxwxl8KBtiuDchtOqCNVPDWRkuHaOP2IPY/fu4ua/XwGIWqXc3llTAkmB/+Y=@dpdk.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxtp8+wlHvCBHzGSM+a3ElpiyxsaE/hLFlt8yS5w0aFkoX325qA 6qQPJdTAyCE/8dpSdcUj8hy4gJpz8tqPPhv73jElU76LQbppeYWKdpFmOxsReZo= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncu7hcylyGWPP/CzZqCPyh3LbquJAdiT/OrPPx/xNtzjPWmt9HNsRKwRZ38iPi0 /cAzPq4jyE+W4ZpJY111TzxjadXLdGQ0bWJm5847MyJjLZApbFaP6RbR+ompULB91YSGjvgS9Cp CN/NOx/YN1GpPxERn4ouqcNl0/VGZLENwRl7+psrEiVuxyDCUPkbAHaswfXjTwnqx3aG11I2rIA k29yDbNgOsoK5KRXMhbfg3y0sYEKWtf2edGOQKyPZE2QRsFu01nEjc/Fz5fOz72VoFQXl648p9k tLFDyp64Dsivwbqb3sserYbRDO2qOSyVr1tvxz2K5xt0R76FTdgiBudwWtVfm/SSYOARxr5UqKA lG85NN9fpgFRVsZ1QPtqt X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHElR3J7oVweWNV65VFTXG3ajqPLMSPlxp3+LBgBvuYctpYafHCjIUT5Rpqqk1G3vQkEuJMRg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:2fc6:b0:2fa:17dd:6afa with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-303a7f6d40amr1789286a91.17.1743020751659; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 13:25:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-96-226.wavecable.com. [204.195.96.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-3039dff0534sm682376a91.17.2025.03.26.13.25.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 26 Mar 2025 13:25:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 13:25:48 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula Cc: Jerin Jacob , "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [RFC 2/2] eventdev: add default software vector adapter Message-ID: <20250326132548.18a7e8ad@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: References: <20250326131441.5965-1-pbhagavatula@marvell.com> <20250326131441.5965-3-pbhagavatula@marvell.com> <20250326071857.7ef4a050@hermes.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 17:25:32 +0000 Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 18:44:36 +0530 > > wrote: > > > > > +struct sw_vector_adapter_service_data { > > > + uint32_t service_id; > > > + RTE_ATOMIC(rte_mcslock_t *) lock; > > > + RTE_TAILQ_HEAD(, sw_vector_adapter_data) adapter_list; > > > +}; > > > > Why the indirect pointer to the lock? rather than embedding it in > > the structure? > > IIUC, the lock itself is declared and used as a pointer right? > I looked at examples from test_mcslock.c, and this seemed correct. > Forgot, these locks used linked list of waiters, and root is a pointer.