From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: mb@smartsharesystems.com, Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] doc: provide examples of using lcores EAL parameter
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 14:24:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250407132451.1101691-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> (raw)
The "--lcores" EAL parameter has a very powerful syntax that can be used
to provide precise control over lcore mappings. The docs however, only
provided a minimal description of what it can do. Augment the docs by
providing some examples of use of the option, and what the resulting
core mappings would be.
Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
---
doc/guides/linux_gsg/eal_args.include.rst | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
diff --git a/doc/guides/linux_gsg/eal_args.include.rst b/doc/guides/linux_gsg/eal_args.include.rst
index 9cfbf7de84..081f09d353 100644
--- a/doc/guides/linux_gsg/eal_args.include.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/linux_gsg/eal_args.include.rst
@@ -29,6 +29,31 @@ Lcore-related options
The grouping ``()`` can be omitted for single element group.
The ``@`` can be omitted if cpus and lcores have the same value.
+ Examples:
+
+ ``--lcores=1-3``: Run threads on physical CPUs 1, 2 and 3,
+ with each thread having the same lcore id as the physical CPU id.
+
+ ``--lcores=1@(1,2)``: Run a single thread with lcore id 1,
+ but with that thread bound to both physical CPUs 1 and 2,
+ so it can run on either, as determined by the operating system.
+
+ ``--lcores='1@31,2@32,3@33'``: Run threads having internal lcore ids of 1, 2 and 3,
+ but with the threads being bound to physical CPUs 31, 32 and 33.
+
+ ``--lcores='(1-3)@(31-33)'``: Run three threads with lcore ids 1, 2 and 3.
+ Unlike the previous example above,
+ each of these threads is not bound to one specific lcore,
+ but rather, all three threads are instead bound to the three physical cores 31, 32 and 33.
+
+ ``--lcores=(1-3)@20``: Run three threads, with lcore ids 1, 2 and 3,
+ where all three threads are bound to (can only run on) physical CPU 20.
+
+.. Note::
+ Binding multiple DPDK lcores can cause problems with poor performance or deadlock when using
+ DPDK rings or memory pools or spinlocks.
+ Such a configuration should only be used with care.
+
.. Note::
At a given instance only one core option ``--lcores``, ``-l`` or ``-c`` can
be used.
--
2.45.2
next reply other threads:[~2025-04-07 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-07 13:24 Bruce Richardson [this message]
2025-04-07 13:27 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-04-07 14:19 ` Morten Brørup
2025-04-07 15:49 ` [PATCH v2] " Bruce Richardson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250407132451.1101691-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).