DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	Praveen Shetty <praveen.shetty@intel.com>,
	dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] net/idpf: avoid truncation of constant value
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 06:51:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250411135155.GA16808@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8wMtW5y+-k=jCUg5RFizbbn1SLbRj8nNicVqrQQK6g_=g@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 08:52:12AM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 4:27 PM Bruce Richardson
> <bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 12:54:40PM +0000, Praveen Shetty wrote:
> > > Truncation of constant value compiler warning was reported in clang/msvc
> > > compiler for the VIRTCHNL2_CAP_OEM bit setting.This is due to 64 bit number
> > > is initialized in a 32 bit enum.VIRTCHNL2_CAP_OEM capability is not used in
> > > the present dpdk code,so removing this bit setting from the dpdk to avoid
> > > the truncation.
> >
> > Please just watch spacing after punctuation in commit message. Will fix on
> > apply as necessary, no need for new revision to fix it.
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Praveen Shetty <praveen.shetty@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/net/intel/idpf/base/virtchnl2.h | 2 --
> > >  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/idpf/base/virtchnl2.h b/drivers/net/intel/idpf/base/virtchnl2.h
> > > index 3285a2b674..cf010c0504 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/intel/idpf/base/virtchnl2.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/intel/idpf/base/virtchnl2.h
> > > @@ -265,8 +265,6 @@ enum virtchnl2_cap_other {
> > >        * if a reserved bit is set in a standard completion's tag.
> > >        */
> > >       VIRTCHNL2_CAP_MISS_COMPL_TAG            = BIT_ULL(20),
> > > -     /* This must be the last capability */
> > > -     VIRTCHNL2_CAP_OEM                       = BIT_ULL(63),
> > >  };
> > >
> >
> > Although technically perhaps not as good as [1], this avoids significant
> > divergence from the shared base code, while still fixing the core issue.
> >
> > Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> >
> >
> > [1] https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/1734537913-1159-1-git-send-email-andremue@linux.microsoft.com/
> 
> LGTM.
> I marked Andre patch as rejected.
> 

I'm good with that. My main goal is to get this code to compile with MSVC.

> 
> -- 
> David Marchand

      reply	other threads:[~2025-04-11 13:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-09 12:54 Praveen Shetty
2025-04-09 14:27 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-04-11  6:52   ` David Marchand
2025-04-11 13:51     ` Andre Muezerie [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250411135155.GA16808@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net \
    --to=andremue@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=praveen.shetty@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).