From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A3DB465A1; Wed, 16 Apr 2025 02:06:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15DEB40B92; Wed, 16 Apr 2025 02:06:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pl1-f177.google.com (mail-pl1-f177.google.com [209.85.214.177]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3610040655 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2025 02:06:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pl1-f177.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-22401f4d35aso71350065ad.2 for ; Tue, 15 Apr 2025 17:06:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1744761993; x=1745366793; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=P9ATfa+zMYEhb3euNN6C3YDRajyxfg8ldok8mfLkWpQ=; b=v04CbiKKckCpmSyuZSi2hNgPjcbrYIJvFbmH6OvHc4tLXl6aF/xc9wFP8AAJ4moCRE /dUnU3ti+DYHpbiEBuwPrR2Y7lsl2oPTkcEdK7mhZIkhXJkpTwnn0lbG8JhQ9TkLlK5K 8msjTyCH8VXiPSCXQ8eQjko3XKxv/Q3Ii4EmlW3puSNOFOzLdsKeZ2pVZ47hQWHUH2sc NKdoZwUP3sK6HezKtHzX1ojIO2fS2hfKD47+qmSsMNF5ycpeoScYaMUQnDUPPzdUaYP6 oqKoDvqPAPvtxtu+gOTPiLcLCNM8Qd6pHjiM1SaHA9pU3W5XpBIwSJTWG5SV4y12Etri bCqA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1744761993; x=1745366793; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=P9ATfa+zMYEhb3euNN6C3YDRajyxfg8ldok8mfLkWpQ=; b=iXne0G2DPRR/UhAUTzDsjB+3g8X1i3VNbdXVRL8lNEIfrjn8aDZTUaikRkyFi7w94x qAoCHpMGdNc2AWrV7sg6I8W8Tgbq62R3Uneag2ZIgj1NT76hkPaiua/gy/GDLS6TvpBR +cdFOC6JrVbsGDiakO1ughsYHZ43j1fTIxU5mjKRu5f69mNtJrxMyCNiQ1YHCpRlLxi8 7ahDyqMuCUpfQeKIrXCuMr5nwgMCYCMzmtGWPntXgJbVnbd1PyCF+zJbNooWc3UH7afp wdCcbmiOBcYM4AUtX6Ys7KASSf4x6FX3jFS9XRbz7VE8CS1wBCQkPF7J/5ugZ0KbHeTx zPZg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyUE82hErWlBYioc0ailcd4ueI1uZ+Nm35AMHjNVodU0saPmENZ syCRO21qFVEhD4OrC8ZiQ8jI0VZ6Pr0CU4T2ADZ2d8txnSbfk7XdeRWqslG76zk= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctQ1LTl96zKkWBeYBsfp/qffSpDyhyjfgQG+AVL9NVZ1ZbDyN5ajbJg9i+96a9 upYZ/OLzhgQkJLaqqRIDmMh0DdTprZXTXvlrjnl3+otIdqJu9X701nvDonkDo1ceTqecqcdeJc7 m/RsNek+ta7/fLx67SXMYONvnBKHh2sscNcuKRmi+3tsm195cVIs4UKwGwvPtX8ViqqrIXhEYiX wwzkK4VF1bBvk9tdT58BEIjBZpidqtwzXxmfXY+5S27+ku3JkvpWNFCcizY9OLD48FBBJThpC9K i35bGqCSnL7hdKlg4efBXnR30ZHBytjzycWlbd00NdGT76wzcBQ/eVnlSJu2xns/1p2KQ+qW0uN Dp38q9Objg4WfHCRc X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGDUTKe6p+okaclPhxWOpK6/y1x6nW6A0T1YLruVVTMLNz8eIvuOkiQ0Z8YKWVj2NFPp+SqXw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3ece:b0:2ff:570d:88c5 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-3085ef0c157mr1744707a91.9.1744761993280; Tue, 15 Apr 2025 17:06:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-96-226.wavecable.com. [204.195.96.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-3086122a8absm207532a91.35.2025.04.15.17.06.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 15 Apr 2025 17:06:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 17:06:28 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: "lihuisong (C)" Cc: , , Aman Singh , Chengwen Feng , Dongdong Liu Subject: Re: [RFC 01/13] app/testpmd: revert auto attach/detach Message-ID: <20250415170628.44bbfac7@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: <89e4321b-4a28-400a-b54b-b723de2f6730@huawei.com> References: <20250411234927.114568-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20250411234927.114568-2-stephen@networkplumber.org> <89e4321b-4a28-400a-b54b-b723de2f6730@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 21:28:07 +0800 "lihuisong (C)" wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > The main cause of cpfl driver attach failure is the added alarm in new > event callback to setup port automatically. > It's a question of when to set up the new port. Please see the > discussion[1]. I have a stupid method, but I'm not very willing to do that. > For the Bugzilla id1695, I'll take a look at it. > > [1] https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1671 > For now I am going to revert the testpmd change. Come back when you have something that works without breaking pdump application.