From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AC1F469F8; Thu, 19 Jun 2025 09:11:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68AEA42DF0; Thu, 19 Jun 2025 09:11:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 797784025E for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2025 09:11:21 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1750317081; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=jxJ8G3DEFEdXyN2Qk1FcBJxUzsKJWaqMh4/fmOqkEAo=; b=YP8yy/jYCJrpas5XZ3xSYIQ6R94XgQuHo7jDmsZxWPvm2OS0m38x30oJWm/1tt+UUKheZz HfhFvvkg3zcC3GreRZg3ct6FqdsUTzmkiqlLdYCSxo3k8TqFYahwKAl/oWZ3J6kA0Z6pfs U6DB6zjZAFsPPTBk0jALnqpl3EdSBKY= Received: from mx-prod-mc-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-35-165-154-97.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.165.154.97]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-180--L1XIg3eOoKrQR-u3Vsw1g-1; Thu, 19 Jun 2025 03:11:17 -0400 X-MC-Unique: -L1XIg3eOoKrQR-u3Vsw1g-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: -L1XIg3eOoKrQR-u3Vsw1g_1750317077 Received: from mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.111]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C29A9180AE05; Thu, 19 Jun 2025 07:11:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dmarchan.lan (unknown [10.44.33.8]) by mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6012018003FC; Thu, 19 Jun 2025 07:11:15 +0000 (UTC) From: David Marchand To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: Aaron Conole , Michael Santana Subject: [PATCH 01/10] ci: save ccache on failure Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 09:10:27 +0200 Message-ID: <20250619071037.37325-2-david.marchand@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20250619071037.37325-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> References: <20250619071037.37325-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.111 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: TesTqqtjjGdx1ZDeabHfnxEmR23Nf_FBcDgnvXQDzQU_1750317077 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; x-default=true X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org When troubleshooting unit test failures and repeating jobs in GHA, the absence of ccache makes the whole process way slower. Signed-off-by: David Marchand --- .github/workflows/build.yml | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/.github/workflows/build.yml b/.github/workflows/build.yml index e5f17ef6ac..6c4bc664d0 100644 --- a/.github/workflows/build.yml +++ b/.github/workflows/build.yml @@ -164,6 +164,12 @@ jobs: chmod o-w $HOME - name: Build and test run: .ci/linux-build.sh + - name: Save ccache on failure + if: failure() + uses: actions/cache/save@v4 + with: + path: ~/.ccache + key: ${{ steps.get_ref_keys.outputs.ccache }}-${{ github.ref }} - name: Upload logs on failure if: failure() uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4 -- 2.49.0