From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0657446A64; Thu, 26 Jun 2025 16:00:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E71BC4025D; Thu, 26 Jun 2025 16:00:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-qk1-f182.google.com (mail-qk1-f182.google.com [209.85.222.182]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B18FB40156 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 26 Jun 2025 16:00:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-qk1-f182.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-7d3900f90f6so99903885a.1 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 26 Jun 2025 07:00:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1750946421; x=1751551221; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=WOddBWcA9vhhlD9AZaf+TP+o5s4RfXBD9X9KYSS5v38=; b=dweqLO+2oItKX0P8benlaEp52uKfUDPG1BtVGeiCY+fL9zaLbw1vw+6btuiVqq9Z7I pw8mMkNv+yY4+AddDIr7Q5dWGfmivkCKl3QmVNDxNOchc21RZFqEZtrhS7qzBWlXjZnl DJ5vn9q3Y6CIKzgu8NI/e+B+LRopa+kyIwVkj5W7AstgwNPuWHMs4aj+AoU9kAbR54gW oyOfk5oxhh+toEY1d280HvQaTJhT4w0XbIXJUzcZVuflhWXg7cqEZAb9vUt9y2mV/VpT wg8PZ/XTxaDPaxykqYUfh8PpzGj2cdskziix+RBoEE44ATL52D1Y6+PEftfEP2MyQhgt JQ1Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1750946421; x=1751551221; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=WOddBWcA9vhhlD9AZaf+TP+o5s4RfXBD9X9KYSS5v38=; b=BbS4zXdXjBfh0b7DebIIk3d/tdnTB/pbxksAXEQzm4CR/vN4REIdZiB6kZnamiNg3u thP1m0VQ+2I/svaPEOJAtM7JQ5fa/Pn60zzrfU/UFiwlxOSKoKxGW+MqBV4lOeomWwNh I2Le6i7/Yvwyy4+sBu/rVVF5ZRSAjdplm9IZ7jnaw9vWh2keEkx9U48AM81TF9URjT4D KplGe1MVaeP0CgieGzKyJSmyct//3RY6SlmY1/rvFYd0OGoyFIIm95qXpHvlmXBTZ/Z8 /sNHi/2MMZVyUsOMkdprMjHquHO0BuA5QGsB3AxbjJwPK0G7TX1hmz6UEf3yXIc8tU6P Y7qw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVtqcHeAdU70/RPMrLrJU8xh0p+K6RrGduM5ARbx560I0QzwOMHlJQwjEBc2Jipvrmhkck=@dpdk.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy7FoCqcs4Hci89dCuXjpNyvMp97JCKZSwqcBE6l7LGh0djcH9S vrIsYYi7I+iDcGJuG8ypMSmNPIQOtkbWkqMxZHZ1tXah4StXlZr9dsxSV9SO6RkDkeE= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctURG4gd1ef3CWu5L2WAyWQmtDRDXKps8KsLnR00MUpMnpmVPuKT3htEUfs3iz iaiAoF2FUiiDumc8Um6kZ/aGkq/7/5raWZBxnM88zAqZPB+zOq1XkmKiVwsxOvR3+g8ShhWG/MA YFzXbYQSlZIB1rz0NQJJ/fzQ1nLYO8hUlS4CWEUz7ywBtgOX1UThk1RuhrMhInet7Y3ygO+E8yt +TkfN0E8Yf+HYXJsSr4ww7niJr/EBikjZeIWiFq+c3ssA21HziV2tJzq3gZRKSsHE4WQX+3vyq/ 4t2u/nO8W93pW8GvWAU8P+MYddhgEO6blsnyGkBuO6KOXkFJB0B9MLpk5TuuvgBD5nYyl8o/4/I pj3kh9Y5pHm9qMLo9fjyf/8KuDEV5nONTk/DK0FE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHt3C1ssWKbQYA/GXqT8x7N7cYCG+aTQM/+wqdFz37+Sz8dTbNAy475uleK6tZxi/EbH9LoBQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:4492:b0:7d0:a1c9:65a7 with SMTP id af79cd13be357-7d4296d50dbmr1079322385a.6.1750946415260; Thu, 26 Jun 2025 07:00:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-96-226.wavecable.com. [204.195.96.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id af79cd13be357-7d44313689fsm4083285a.16.2025.06.26.07.00.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 26 Jun 2025 07:00:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 07:00:11 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com> Cc: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>, <dev@dpdk.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] eal: deprecate old coremask-based EAL parameters Message-ID: <20250626070011.291d8f70@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: <aFl8-3IuF9WU_YAe@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20250313113829.1480907-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <20250527152913.279011-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <20250527152913.279011-2-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <CAJFAV8zpV=KUDha1tknK0cgv0cboG0htvJZ1kujtx=EJ7hXQHw@mail.gmail.com> <aFl8-3IuF9WU_YAe@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 17:12:43 +0100 Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 06:01:00PM +0200, David Marchand wrote: > > On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 5:29=E2=80=AFPM Bruce Richardson > > <bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote: =20 > > > > > > As the number of cores/cpus on platforms has increased over the years, > > > the use of coremasks rather than core-lists for identifying DPDK cores > > > has become more and more unwieldy. At this point, let's deprecate the > > > coremask-based EAL parameters for future removal, and point users to = the > > > core-list based versions instead. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com> > > > --- > > > doc/guides/eventdevs/dlb2.rst | 6 +++--- > > > doc/guides/faq/faq.rst | 8 +++----- > > > doc/guides/linux_gsg/build_sample_apps.rst | 7 +++---- > > > doc/guides/linux_gsg/eal_args.include.rst | 8 ++------ > > > doc/guides/prog_guide/meson_ut.rst | 2 +- > > > doc/guides/prog_guide/multi_proc_support.rst | 2 +- > > > doc/guides/prog_guide/service_cores.rst | 8 ++++---- > > > doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 10 ++++++++++ > > > doc/guides/sample_app_ug/ip_frag.rst | 7 +------ > > > doc/guides/sample_app_ug/ip_reassembly.rst | 7 +------ > > > doc/guides/sample_app_ug/multi_process.rst | 14 +++++--------- > > > doc/guides/sample_app_ug/qos_scheduler.rst | 2 +- > > > doc/guides/sample_app_ug/test_pipeline.rst | 2 +- > > > doc/guides/tools/testbbdev.rst | 2 +- > > > lib/eal/common/eal_common_options.c | 6 ++++++ > > > 15 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-) =20 > >=20 > > This patch will need some rebase. > >=20 > > I see you fixed a few docs, but there are quite some misses in > > copy/pasted blocks: > > =20 > I'll take a look and respin this. >=20 > I'm think of separating it into two patches: first patch with the doc > updates to remove use of -c flag. This should happen independent of the > deprecation, I think, and second patch just the deprecation notice. Does > that sound reasonable? >=20 > /Bruce Should also drop use of -n in all the doc examples. I had a patch for that probably buried somewhere.