DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix connection tracking state item validation
@ 2025-08-05 13:23 Khadem Ullah
  2025-08-05 14:44 ` Ivan Malov
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Khadem Ullah @ 2025-08-05 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dariusz Sosnowski, Viacheslav Ovsiienko, Bing Zhao, Ori Kam,
	Suanming Mou, Matan Azrad
  Cc: dev, stable, Khadem Ullah

This patch validate a connection tracking state when matching
'conntrack is' in rte_flow rules. The conntract possible CT states
are SYN_RECV, ESTABLISHED, FIN_WAIT, CLOSE_WAIT, LAST_ACK and
TIME_WAIT. Therefore the maximum possible value to match on
in rte_flow is TIME_WAIT but mlx5 allowed matching on any values.

This patch validate the CT state item.
Fixes: aca19061e4b9 ('net/mlx5: validate connection tracking item')
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Khadem Ullah <14pwcse1224@uetpeshawar.edu.pk>
---
 drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
index 7b9e5018b8..750385cd42 100644
--- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
+++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
@@ -3290,6 +3290,11 @@ mlx5_flow_dv_validate_item_aso_ct(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
 						  NULL,
 						  "Conflict status bits");
 	}
+	if (spec->flags > RTE_FLOW_CONNTRACK_STATE_TIME_WAIT)
+		return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
+					RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
+					NULL,
+					"Invalid CT state matching \n");
 	/* State change also needs to be considered. */
 	*item_flags |= MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_ASO_CT;
 	return 0;
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix connection tracking state item validation
  2025-08-05 13:23 [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix connection tracking state item validation Khadem Ullah
@ 2025-08-05 14:44 ` Ivan Malov
  2025-08-06  8:51   ` Khadem Ullah
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ivan Malov @ 2025-08-05 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Khadem Ullah
  Cc: Dariusz Sosnowski, Viacheslav Ovsiienko, Bing Zhao, Ori Kam,
	Suanming Mou, Matan Azrad, dev, stable

Hi,

On Tue, 5 Aug 2025, Khadem Ullah wrote:

> This patch validate a connection tracking state when matching
> 'conntrack is' in rte_flow rules. The conntract possible CT states
> are SYN_RECV, ESTABLISHED, FIN_WAIT, CLOSE_WAIT, LAST_ACK and
> TIME_WAIT. Therefore the maximum possible value to match on
> in rte_flow is TIME_WAIT but mlx5 allowed matching on any values.
>
> This patch validate the CT state item.
> Fixes: aca19061e4b9 ('net/mlx5: validate connection tracking item')
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Khadem Ullah <14pwcse1224@uetpeshawar.edu.pk>
> ---
> drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
> index 7b9e5018b8..750385cd42 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
> @@ -3290,6 +3290,11 @@ mlx5_flow_dv_validate_item_aso_ct(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> 						  NULL,
> 						  "Conflict status bits");
> 	}
> +	if (spec->flags > RTE_FLOW_CONNTRACK_STATE_TIME_WAIT)
> +		return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> +					RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
> +					NULL,
> +					"Invalid CT state matching \n");

It might be better to enclose the multi-line block in brackets.

Also, is it correct to treat 'flags' like enum 'RTE_FLOW_CONNTRACK_STATE'?
I thought it was following 'RTE_FLOW_CONNTRACK_PKT_STATE' flags instead [1].

[1] https://doc.dpdk.org/api-25.07/rte__flow_8h.html#a7a41946aa03ebca8c432279604265b51

Or am I missing something?

Thank you.

> 	/* State change also needs to be considered. */
> 	*item_flags |= MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_ASO_CT;
> 	return 0;
> -- 
> 2.43.0
>
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix connection tracking state item validation
  2025-08-05 14:44 ` Ivan Malov
@ 2025-08-06  8:51   ` Khadem Ullah
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Khadem Ullah @ 2025-08-06  8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ivan.malov
  Cc: dsosnowski, viacheslavo, bingz, orika, suanmingm, matan, dev, stable

Hi Ivan, 

The multi-line block was not closed in brackets due to coding style.

Spec provides values to match (e.g. a given IPv4 address) in rte_flow rules. 
Incase of the flowing rte_flow rule, spec provides in 
mlx5_flow_dv_validate_item_aso_ct the conntrack state to be validated. 

The following is a valid rule and it should be offloaded. 

flow create 0 group 5 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / tcp / conntrack is 1 / end actions queue index 5 / end

and the following is an invalid rule which should be rejected, as there is no conntract state corresponds to 10.
flow create 0 group 5 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / tcp / conntrack is 10 / end actions queue index 5 / end

Please check https://doc.dpdk.org/guides-24.07/prog_guide/rte_flow.html#pattern-item

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2025-08-06  8:51 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-08-05 13:23 [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix connection tracking state item validation Khadem Ullah
2025-08-05 14:44 ` Ivan Malov
2025-08-06  8:51   ` Khadem Ullah

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).