DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Ivan Malov <ivan.malov@arknetworks.am>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
	Andy Moreton <andy.moreton@amd.com>,
	Pieter Jansen Van Vuuren <pieter.jansen-van-vuuren@amd.com>,
	Viacheslav Galaktionov <viacheslav.galaktionov@arknetworks.am>,
	stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] common/sfc_efx/base: revise legacy port controls on Medford4
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 08:20:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250813082041.3edfc0fa@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250813123636.16363-1-ivan.malov@arknetworks.am>

On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 16:36:36 +0400
Ivan Malov <ivan.malov@arknetworks.am> wrote:

> Theoretically, adaptor firmware may not support new netport API. Currently,
> efx_np_supported() assumes Medford4 always supports the API, however, this
> can be improved in the future by checking some capability bit during probe.
> 
> If efx_np_supported() returns B_FALSE, then one should not invoke Medford4
> PHY and MAC methods that are inherently dependent on new netport API. Pick
> EF10-generic PHY and MAC methods in this case to maintain legacy behaviour.
> 
> Fixes: 8dac31d073af ("common/sfc_efx/base: introduce Medford4 stub for MAC methods")
> Fixes: d65a7129c413 ("common/sfc_efx/base: introduce Medford4 stub for PHY methods")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Malov <ivan.malov@arknetworks.am>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Moreton <andy.moreton@amd.com>
> ---

Applied to next-net

      reply	other threads:[~2025-08-13 15:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-13 12:36 Ivan Malov
2025-08-13 15:20 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250813082041.3edfc0fa@hermes.local \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=andy.moreton@amd.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ivan.malov@arknetworks.am \
    --cc=pieter.jansen-van-vuuren@amd.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=viacheslav.galaktionov@arknetworks.am \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).