DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dariusz Sosnowski <dsosnowski@nvidia.com>
To: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <mkashani@nvidia.com>, <rasland@nvidia.com>,
	<thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>,
	"Bing Zhao" <bingz@nvidia.com>, Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>,
	Suanming Mou <suanmingm@nvidia.com>,
	Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] net/mlx5: support PF representor suppression in multi-port E-Switch
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 11:12:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251112101255.i2475aeecar5likn@ds-vm-debian.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251106055246.360824-2-getelson@nvidia.com>

On Thu, Nov 06, 2025 at 07:52:45AM +0200, Gregory Etelson wrote:
> In multi-port E-Switch setup, the MLX5 PMD always added
> PF representor port.
> For example, `representor=pf1vf[0,1]` implicitly added PF1 representor
> port:
> 
> ```
> Port     Name
> 0        p0
> 1        p1
> 2        representor_c0pf1vf0
> 3        representor_c0pf1vf1
> ```
> 
> The patch adds support for the new representor format that suppresses
> PF representor attachment:
> 
> Example: `representor=(pf1)vf[0,1]`
> 
> ```
> Port     Name
> 0        p0
> 1        representor_c0pf1vf0
> 2        representor_c0pf1vf1
> ```
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>

Ackedy-by: Dariusz Sosnowski <dsosnowski@nvidia.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-12 10:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-28  9:58 [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: make representor parameter more explicit Gregory Etelson
2025-10-28  9:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] net/mlx5: support PF representor suppresion in multi-port E-Switch Gregory Etelson
2025-11-05 17:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ethdev: make representor parameter more explicit Gregory Etelson
2025-11-05 17:37   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] net/mlx5: support PF representor suppresion in multi-port E-Switch Gregory Etelson
2025-11-05 17:48 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] ethdev: make representor parameter more explicit Gregory Etelson
2025-11-05 17:48   ` [PATCH v3 2/2] net/mlx5: support PF representor suppression in multi-port E-Switch Gregory Etelson
2025-11-05 19:20   ` [PATCH v3 1/2] ethdev: make representor parameter more explicit Stephen Hemminger
2025-11-05 21:17     ` Thomas Monjalon
2025-11-06  5:52 ` [PATCH v4 " Gregory Etelson
2025-11-06  5:52   ` [PATCH v4 2/2] net/mlx5: support PF representor suppression in multi-port E-Switch Gregory Etelson
2025-11-12 10:12     ` Dariusz Sosnowski [this message]
2025-11-09 14:42   ` [PATCH v4 1/2] ethdev: make representor parameter more explicit Andrew Rybchenko
2025-11-12 10:24     ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251112101255.i2475aeecar5likn@ds-vm-debian.local \
    --to=dsosnowski@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bingz@nvidia.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=getelson@nvidia.com \
    --cc=matan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=mkashani@nvidia.com \
    --cc=orika@nvidia.com \
    --cc=rasland@nvidia.com \
    --cc=suanmingm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).