* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] i40e: fix the issue reported by klocwork
@ 2015-02-12 11:22 Jingjing Wu
2015-03-30 20:14 ` Thomas Monjalon
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jingjing Wu @ 2015-02-12 11:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev
Klocwork reports array 'src_offset' may use index 16.
In function i40e_srcoff_to_flx_pit, index j + 1 can reach I40E_FDIR_MAX_FLEX_LEN.
This patch fixes this issue to avoid array bound.
Signed-off-by: Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
---
lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_fdir.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_fdir.c b/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_fdir.c
index 68511c8..bc36d8e 100644
--- a/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_fdir.c
+++ b/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_fdir.c
@@ -402,28 +402,27 @@ i40e_srcoff_to_flx_pit(const uint16_t *src_offset,
while (j < I40E_FDIR_MAX_FLEX_LEN) {
size = 1;
- for (; j < I40E_FDIR_MAX_FLEX_LEN; j++) {
+ for (; j < I40E_FDIR_MAX_FLEX_LEN - 1; j++) {
if (src_offset[j + 1] == src_offset[j] + 1)
size++;
- else {
- src_tmp = src_offset[j] + 1 - size;
- /* the flex_pit need to be sort by scr_offset */
- for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
- if (src_tmp < flex_pit[i].src_offset)
- break;
- }
- /* if insert required, move backward */
- for (k = num; k > i; k--)
- flex_pit[k] = flex_pit[k - 1];
- /* insert */
- flex_pit[i].dst_offset = j + 1 - size;
- flex_pit[i].src_offset = src_tmp;
- flex_pit[i].size = size;
- j++;
- num++;
+ else
+ break;
+ }
+ src_tmp = src_offset[j] + 1 - size;
+ /* the flex_pit need to be sort by src_offset */
+ for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
+ if (src_tmp < flex_pit[i].src_offset)
break;
- }
}
+ /* if insert required, move backward */
+ for (k = num; k > i; k--)
+ flex_pit[k] = flex_pit[k - 1];
+ /* insert */
+ flex_pit[i].dst_offset = j + 1 - size;
+ flex_pit[i].src_offset = src_tmp;
+ flex_pit[i].size = size;
+ j++;
+ num++;
}
return num;
}
--
1.9.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] i40e: fix the issue reported by klocwork
2015-02-12 11:22 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] i40e: fix the issue reported by klocwork Jingjing Wu
@ 2015-03-30 20:14 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-03-31 6:11 ` Zhang, Helin
2015-03-31 8:56 ` Cao, Min
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2015-03-30 20:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: helin.zhang; +Cc: dev
Helin, is this patch valid and important?
2015-02-12 19:22, Jingjing Wu:
> Klocwork reports array 'src_offset' may use index 16.
> In function i40e_srcoff_to_flx_pit, index j + 1 can reach I40E_FDIR_MAX_FLEX_LEN.
> This patch fixes this issue to avoid array bound.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
> ---
> lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_fdir.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_fdir.c b/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_fdir.c
> index 68511c8..bc36d8e 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_fdir.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_fdir.c
> @@ -402,28 +402,27 @@ i40e_srcoff_to_flx_pit(const uint16_t *src_offset,
>
> while (j < I40E_FDIR_MAX_FLEX_LEN) {
> size = 1;
> - for (; j < I40E_FDIR_MAX_FLEX_LEN; j++) {
> + for (; j < I40E_FDIR_MAX_FLEX_LEN - 1; j++) {
> if (src_offset[j + 1] == src_offset[j] + 1)
> size++;
> - else {
> - src_tmp = src_offset[j] + 1 - size;
> - /* the flex_pit need to be sort by scr_offset */
> - for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
> - if (src_tmp < flex_pit[i].src_offset)
> - break;
> - }
> - /* if insert required, move backward */
> - for (k = num; k > i; k--)
> - flex_pit[k] = flex_pit[k - 1];
> - /* insert */
> - flex_pit[i].dst_offset = j + 1 - size;
> - flex_pit[i].src_offset = src_tmp;
> - flex_pit[i].size = size;
> - j++;
> - num++;
> + else
> + break;
> + }
> + src_tmp = src_offset[j] + 1 - size;
> + /* the flex_pit need to be sort by src_offset */
> + for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
> + if (src_tmp < flex_pit[i].src_offset)
> break;
> - }
> }
> + /* if insert required, move backward */
> + for (k = num; k > i; k--)
> + flex_pit[k] = flex_pit[k - 1];
> + /* insert */
> + flex_pit[i].dst_offset = j + 1 - size;
> + flex_pit[i].src_offset = src_tmp;
> + flex_pit[i].size = size;
> + j++;
> + num++;
> }
> return num;
> }
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] i40e: fix the issue reported by klocwork
2015-02-12 11:22 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] i40e: fix the issue reported by klocwork Jingjing Wu
2015-03-30 20:14 ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2015-03-31 6:11 ` Zhang, Helin
2015-03-31 10:27 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-04-01 19:47 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-03-31 8:56 ` Cao, Min
2 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Zhang, Helin @ 2015-03-31 6:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wu, Jingjing, dev
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jingjing Wu
> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 7:22 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] i40e: fix the issue reported by klocwork
>
> Klocwork reports array 'src_offset' may use index 16.
> In function i40e_srcoff_to_flx_pit, index j + 1 can reach
> I40E_FDIR_MAX_FLEX_LEN.
> This patch fixes this issue to avoid array bound.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Helin Zhang <helin.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
> lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_fdir.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] i40e: fix the issue reported by klocwork
2015-03-31 6:11 ` Zhang, Helin
@ 2015-03-31 10:27 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-04-01 1:26 ` Zhang, Helin
2015-04-01 19:47 ` Thomas Monjalon
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2015-03-31 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhang, Helin; +Cc: dev
Hi Helin,
> > Klocwork reports array 'src_offset' may use index 16.
> > In function i40e_srcoff_to_flx_pit, index j + 1 can reach
> > I40E_FDIR_MAX_FLEX_LEN.
> > This patch fixes this issue to avoid array bound.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Helin Zhang <helin.zhang@intel.com>
Please confirm it's a real bug which needs to be fixed in 2.0,
and/or you are sure this patch won't bring a new problem.
Thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] i40e: fix the issue reported by klocwork
2015-03-31 10:27 ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2015-04-01 1:26 ` Zhang, Helin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Zhang, Helin @ 2015-04-01 1:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Monjalon; +Cc: dev
Hi Thomas
Actually it is a bug fix. It would be better to be put in R2.0.
It may not crash, as it just possibly read something out of range. I am waiting the test report from our validation team, and then I will merge that. Thanks for your patience!
Regards,
Helin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 6:28 PM
> To: Zhang, Helin
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Wu, Jingjing
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] i40e: fix the issue reported by klocwork
>
> Hi Helin,
>
> > > Klocwork reports array 'src_offset' may use index 16.
> > > In function i40e_srcoff_to_flx_pit, index j + 1 can reach
> > > I40E_FDIR_MAX_FLEX_LEN.
> > > This patch fixes this issue to avoid array bound.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
> > Acked-by: Helin Zhang <helin.zhang@intel.com>
>
> Please confirm it's a real bug which needs to be fixed in 2.0, and/or you are sure
> this patch won't bring a new problem.
>
> Thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] i40e: fix the issue reported by klocwork
2015-03-31 6:11 ` Zhang, Helin
2015-03-31 10:27 ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2015-04-01 19:47 ` Thomas Monjalon
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2015-04-01 19:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wu, Jingjing; +Cc: dev
> > Klocwork reports array 'src_offset' may use index 16.
> > In function i40e_srcoff_to_flx_pit, index j + 1 can reach
> > I40E_FDIR_MAX_FLEX_LEN.
> > This patch fixes this issue to avoid array bound.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Helin Zhang <helin.zhang@intel.com>
Fixes: d8b90c4eabe9 ("i40e: take flow director flexible payload configuration")
Applied, thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] i40e: fix the issue reported by klocwork
2015-02-12 11:22 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] i40e: fix the issue reported by klocwork Jingjing Wu
2015-03-30 20:14 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-03-31 6:11 ` Zhang, Helin
@ 2015-03-31 8:56 ` Cao, Min
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Cao, Min @ 2015-03-31 8:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wu, Jingjing, dev
Tested-by: Min Cao <min.cao@intel.com>
Patch name: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] i40e: fix the issue reported by klocwork
Test Flag: Tested-by
Tester name: min.cao@intel.com
Result summary: total 2 cases, 2passed, 0 failed
Test Case 1:
Name: ipv4 fwd
Environment: OS: Fedora20 3.11.10-301.fc20.x86_64
gcc (GCC) 4.8.2
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 0 @ 2.70GHz
NIC: Fortville eagle
Test result: PASSED
Detail: ipv4 fwd
Test Case 2:
Name: ipv6 fwd
Environment: OS: Fedora20 3.11.10-301.fc20.x86_64
gcc (GCC) 4.8.2
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 0 @ 2.70GHz
NIC: Fortville eagle
Test result: PASSED
Detail: ipv6 fwd
-----Original Message-----
From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jingjing Wu
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 7:22 PM
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] i40e: fix the issue reported by klocwork
Klocwork reports array 'src_offset' may use index 16.
In function i40e_srcoff_to_flx_pit, index j + 1 can reach I40E_FDIR_MAX_FLEX_LEN.
This patch fixes this issue to avoid array bound.
Signed-off-by: Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
---
lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_fdir.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_fdir.c b/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_fdir.c
index 68511c8..bc36d8e 100644
--- a/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_fdir.c
+++ b/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_fdir.c
@@ -402,28 +402,27 @@ i40e_srcoff_to_flx_pit(const uint16_t *src_offset,
while (j < I40E_FDIR_MAX_FLEX_LEN) {
size = 1;
- for (; j < I40E_FDIR_MAX_FLEX_LEN; j++) {
+ for (; j < I40E_FDIR_MAX_FLEX_LEN - 1; j++) {
if (src_offset[j + 1] == src_offset[j] + 1)
size++;
- else {
- src_tmp = src_offset[j] + 1 - size;
- /* the flex_pit need to be sort by scr_offset */
- for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
- if (src_tmp < flex_pit[i].src_offset)
- break;
- }
- /* if insert required, move backward */
- for (k = num; k > i; k--)
- flex_pit[k] = flex_pit[k - 1];
- /* insert */
- flex_pit[i].dst_offset = j + 1 - size;
- flex_pit[i].src_offset = src_tmp;
- flex_pit[i].size = size;
- j++;
- num++;
+ else
+ break;
+ }
+ src_tmp = src_offset[j] + 1 - size;
+ /* the flex_pit need to be sort by src_offset */
+ for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
+ if (src_tmp < flex_pit[i].src_offset)
break;
- }
}
+ /* if insert required, move backward */
+ for (k = num; k > i; k--)
+ flex_pit[k] = flex_pit[k - 1];
+ /* insert */
+ flex_pit[i].dst_offset = j + 1 - size;
+ flex_pit[i].src_offset = src_tmp;
+ flex_pit[i].size = size;
+ j++;
+ num++;
}
return num;
}
--
1.9.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-04-01 19:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-02-12 11:22 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] i40e: fix the issue reported by klocwork Jingjing Wu
2015-03-30 20:14 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-03-31 6:11 ` Zhang, Helin
2015-03-31 10:27 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-04-01 1:26 ` Zhang, Helin
2015-04-01 19:47 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-03-31 8:56 ` Cao, Min
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).