From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78BA6A10DA for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 22:49:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FCDB1C2A9; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 22:49:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20F7C1C28F for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 22:49:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A57A721BA9; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 16:49:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 02 Aug 2019 16:49:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=xd1a/R6+NFBmGbnaLecv0bL/3d3JpmDQA8o5ldATHRQ=; b=Js3gE0QC4Unt A8Dt3ehFNLGt2P2+jJZPKM22v9hgwLyIF/3RXrl+/Un1MWO1l8n5nsSs2Te49Dx9 sGSRKTK718y4WGLUk3CpkQnEXQDaC7rs5IZ1Zklbv40DLx7qdSN4q0HDIHKXHegt b3CrsdrkZEpON/lV/bmVqK0dwetzpF4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=xd1a/R6+NFBmGbnaLecv0bL/3d3JpmDQA8o5ldATH RQ=; b=tgLj772ZahmQZDVUZV3A9RPPAuHSXo3Q3ZCjyZWoHHmFrC4/HazrI26CJ KUorbRP/oWT/NLTwlJsG4j3jiwq0fmyoCRPQ8s1mbIuivcTf/ZYWJr6zko8rgBm9 oQBhcz86mvaCDQa89YbDDTAQFrmQvRE5ZzEg2V7YpKGeJx4Hwajv2b9Gyq8TXUs1 CcxUbkeNX1JWv7qCrs+kAzhKA4TVA1RhC/4/FLm3R2I4QWw/TmeLugagRK51uuIz fFhB3FurRPqMwB8sgnUqvj9fsy+Fl2KvkPu1C3vD/WKco4TEYLDbW8yWVESwMGLS 0pBTJY6MQk4JLrNX2usyjSpNiR78w== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrleelgdduvdeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecukf hppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhh ohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 63E07380083; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 16:49:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: David Marchand Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Michael Santana Francisco , Aaron Conole Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 22:49:22 +0200 Message-ID: <2032723.UeVPLMcCjA@xps> In-Reply-To: References: <1564599390-9684-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test/eal: fix incorrect array sizes X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > > > > Following removal of -c and -n options, the array should have been > > > > shrunk to avoid launch_proc to access unitialised strings. > > > > > > > > Fixes: b4dbacdb1ad7 ("test/eal: set core mask/list config only in dedicated test") > > > > Fixes: 501fa9a40298 ("test/eal: set memory channel config only in dedicated test") > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: David Marchand > Acked-by: Michael Santana Applied, thanks. About the title: "incorrect" after "fix" is always useless. I replaced it with "command" to give a bit more context about what these arrays are for.