From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8BBA1B273 for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 18:00:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F847225B9; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 12:00:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 07 Jan 2019 12:00:35 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=pJtbMzB53TJdMlT7m0bY4MeolXiikcEaPdFCICoNJ5w=; b=LSDSELK6y67v eqpTyPEoEi9TYVXOHXR8tmZsSfNwQKgZj02dydm8XG7w0lmnJGmKKpC6RUNRxXnj Pc/uN3h6E5Np38+h6xvlbvZVQaimDqI/6OXr/h/RBPvchxSJKzSwz2TVilN2yN/Z pj+kOJNpIHLlrTD14DxUwaRM6GhzMw0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=pJtbMzB53TJdMlT7m0bY4MeolXiikcEaPdFCICoNJ 5w=; b=az32q0H3o94gpR+T8LMLuBzNtbyVF9N8q6IG70ueFnVcJsIT0ztGJt2oF DDFBYeC5ImVCY1ej0tj47lqSGylR4bPHnkEv5sqxfS1GCZnPd62zehiWnbaYMbHe 5nvvbhQO7tIqwrty8zSup45ncNSBKsWi7JbihbCUvHFkKydsoufhxdJp+yBLMZoq xkGQLpkjmMmRray4dA9nBd8LxUbM80euad1nuazdaol7f/NQXX8tIYtd+w2tTK/5 7x04+k0GHfnqzs56bzgRET2IMHZdPsQbEODA9ADpQd0+ihy1m46l2qf3Ss9fKseh nHq9GHyd+KlLrZSE3+qOTXqlv5DQw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtledrvdejgdelfeculddtuddrgedtkedrtddtmd cutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfhuthen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecukf hppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhh ohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1289110107; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 12:00:32 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: "Burakov, Anatoly" , Bruce Richardson , 'Jason Messer' , 'Harini Ramakrishnan' , 'Omar Cardona' , 'Ranjit Menon' , 'Mattias =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=F6nnblom=27?= , 'Jeff Shaw' , dev@dpdk.org Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2019 18:00:31 +0100 Message-ID: <2036299.vM9g0LLXL8@xps> In-Reply-To: <20190107085125.3e3adf05@hermes.lan> References: <7824863.MkUOD0j12R@xps> <4ca4ff83-d226-12c4-913c-22737dfc5bb6@intel.com> <20190107085125.3e3adf05@hermes.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Compiler for Windows X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2019 17:00:36 -0000 07/01/2019 17:51, Stephen Hemminger: > On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 16:29:25 +0000 > "Burakov, Anatoly" wrote: > > > On 07-Jan-19 4:15 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 07:51:38AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > >> On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 10:56:57 +0000 > > >> "Burakov, Anatoly" wrote: > > >> > > >>> On 03-Jan-19 6:33 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > >>>> What about Gcc under the WSL thing (ie Linux emulation in Windows). > > >>>> Much better than Cygwin type stuff. > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> WSL is dog-slow with any kind of disk I/O, at least currently, so while > > >>> i do use WSL to fool my IDE into thinking it's running on Linux, the > > >>> actual compilation user experience is horrible. > > >>> > > >> > > >> The newest version uses Hyper-V to run Linux kernel in VM and is better. > > >> Probably all still has issues with translation to NTFS. > > > > Yes, but it takes a while for "newest versions" to trickle down on our > > dev machines :) > > > > > > > > But is running that going to produce windows binaries rather than linux > > > ones? > > > > > > > I believe it's producing Linux binaries, not Windows ones. So probably a > > non-starter. > > > > It would produce Linux binaries. It should be possible to convince it to do > Windows binaries some how. Just hoping there was a way to build DPDK > with standard tools and not having to use cygwin. I believe the right way is to compile from a Windows machine. In this thread, I would like to discuss how to compile on Windows. "Cross" compilation from Linux is also interesting but probably more tricky.