From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C44857D35
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 15:39:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48])
 by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Aug 2017 06:39:20 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.41,393,1498546800"; d="scan'208";a="301800315"
Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.57])
 ([10.237.220.57])
 by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Aug 2017 06:39:19 -0700
To: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>, dev@dpdk.org
References: <cover.1501598383.git.adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
 <ca8426b5aeecbce63cc1c11164434e76ddce2756.1501598384.git.adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Message-ID: <203a53f8-41a2-a3f7-fce2-59379de8ba2c@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 14:39:18 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ca8426b5aeecbce63cc1c11164434e76ddce2756.1501598384.git.adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 04/48] net/mlx4: remove useless
 compilation checks
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 13:39:22 -0000

On 8/1/2017 5:53 PM, Adrien Mazarguil wrote:
> Verbs support for RSS, inline receive and extended device query calls has
> not been optional for a while. Their absence is untested and is therefore
> unsupported.
> 
> Remove the related compilation checks and assume Mellanox OFED is up to
> date, as described in the documentation.

So this requires Mellanox OFED 4.1 is there,
is there a check for the OFED version, or do you think does it required?

> 
> Use this opportunity to remove a few useless data path debugging messages
> behind compilation checks on never defined macros.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>

<...>