* [dpdk-dev] DPDK techboard minutes of February 26
@ 2020-03-05 8:53 Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2020-03-05 8:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: techboard
Minutes of Technical Board meeting, 2020-02-26
Members Attending: 9/11
- Ferruh Yigit
- Hemant Agrawal
- Honnappa Nagarahalli
- Jerin Jacob
- Kevin Traynor
- Konstantin Ananyev
- Olivier Matz
- Stephen Hemminger
- Thomas Monjalon (Chair)
NOTE: Technical Board meetings happen every second Wednesday
on IRC channel #dpdk-board, at 3pm UTC.
Meetings are public and DPDK community members are welcome to attend.
1/ Technical Board status for the Governing Board meeting
- ABI compatibility and tooling
- SPDX conversion almost complete
- Stepping away from Linux out-of-tree modules - new dpdk-kmods repo
- Project scope discussion
- PMDT project - new acceptance guidelines
- Tooling trend (tracing, dumps, metrics, telemetry, monitoring)
- ICC support: warning is not fatal
- Windows port is progressing
- new device classes: vDPA and regex
- IPsec integration is difficult and progressing
- Security pre-release list is not growing a lot
- not tried any mentoring program this year
2/ Doc maintenance
Not much activity on documentation:
- no content improvement
- hard to get good reviews
Volunteers are welcome.
Maintenance of the documentation becomes a recurring techboard topic.
3/ Community lab goals
The Governing Board is evaluating how to progress with DPDK CI.
The Technical Board had to provide status and goals.
The first CI priority was already agreed in previous meeting:
basic ethdev functional testing on real NICs.
Coverity is doing static analysis regularly.
Travis is testing (requires integration for per-patch report):
- libraries (without traffic)
OBS could be integrated for per-patch compilation testing.
The community lab is testing (for each patch):
- compilation on more OSes
- libraries (without traffic)
- micro-benchmark with traffic on real HW
- downstream projects (OVS, SPDK)
Key benefits of the community lab are:
- real HW
- vendor neutrality
The ideal lab should meet these requirements:
- transparent visibility
- coverage summary
- trending graphs
- easy to add/run a test
- easy to reproduce a test locally
- email reports
- per-patch testing integrated with patchwork
- per-commit testing (after merge in master or next-*)
- per-release (including -rc) testing
and should run these tests:
- downstream projects
Three roles are identified.
1) Lab management: hosting, physical setup, monitoring.
2) Framework/Infrastructure (can be remote):
test integration, database, logs, reports, graphs, web pages.
3) development of test cases:
writing and/or evaluating test code for existing features.
Future features could be gated by test requirement.
The third role require community involvement and volunteering.
4/ rte_graph + DPDK scope
The new library rte_graph is accepted to be part of dpdk.org.
During the next meeting, it will be discussed whether
adding rte_graph and similar libraries in the main repository,
or splitting in different git repositories.
The question of possibly dead/unused code in some libraries
should be debated as well.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2020-03-05 8:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-03-05 8:53 [dpdk-dev] DPDK techboard minutes of February 26 Thomas Monjalon
DPDK patches and discussions
This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:
git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git
# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git