From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f51.google.com (mail-wm0-f51.google.com [74.125.82.51]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 603BF2E81 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:36:07 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f51.google.com with SMTP id g62so145758892wme.0 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 02:36:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=aqoG9xEfbMBiNv7w4/uhkCQatxSBAi7ZHLeCyayVoDw=; b=B6cAubxv24XLAsj6iYnLm7XkCGKB477cv7KMIkRohTU1uLiyb4R4WN2z4q7NFSav7M lco1JRCG+axsx07wXp/42rBaR4y0AYi945Eufdr92JGbBwi5pwUNM9E3Bg4UwJADbzIi 4ZwyBpFFVa44oytsgD4LcHdXWZdYX0NOdvGTcRHU2v1hCDajI2grCkFbscjrKBP/J8TL uqsJbIeek+t4UMG1OUOzzubZxwU3q0edf/GvVd+ZYgWGh53ZX+/LJ11cUO0vY/QC5Oeh SHJUEJah50I/muhQfn106rP016fiD2i4/kaJ618Il0dtwpbqMfhawa+i+feQGzGldXSJ S37g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=aqoG9xEfbMBiNv7w4/uhkCQatxSBAi7ZHLeCyayVoDw=; b=mQyKi7czJrcbTrv18bk61ERSxkCH2yKqRP6g/NGpIsUNDMio/Zfox07DyvREOjtvkD 8iUyXUqEwPdkXiKKb+JVvpoAynBhOKw4G5+2K4GyIXprbryMiFkiMo/kyKxW1B3XsMNj Z07LfmJjF2DDiML15n0GFL11diLSz4hKk0Nq2GrjbSq17xBv7XMnDC7jOlec6glwosLM Dqe+vwJTLc6y/dc6NUHjR4DhDWOjvbaDJN+9M8JwO0//1gkujc96+AWbGfKJMCdFmiWO 7+HQ2xd2SwLsifDMVOoqQncFgQUsOxg7AaIyLvx8/poVrzRZwgPcjiH5csfwnzLEdKt2 PAuQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQ2lOfYsqhb3zAHydxwYpW1DwU0WfY4TaGgvTwUsKodAOD2h4mb2A5ifoGJgaQe0oda X-Received: by 10.194.61.240 with SMTP id t16mr21294610wjr.27.1455618967226; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 02:36:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (guy78-3-82-239-227-177.fbx.proxad.net. [82.239.227.177]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t8sm28248817wjy.41.2016.02.16.02.36.06 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 16 Feb 2016 02:36:06 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Bruce Richardson Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:34:35 +0100 Message-ID: <2067679.D9WUs46Auu@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20160216101152.GA24596@bricha3-MOBL3> References: <1453689419-237252-1-git-send-email-ziye.yang@intel.com> <1455596119-4613-1-git-send-email-ziye.yang@intel.com> <20160216101152.GA24596@bricha3-MOBL3> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: Ziye Yang , dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] PCI: ABI change request for adding new field in rte_pci_id structure X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 10:36:07 -0000 2016-02-16 10:11, Bruce Richardson: > Thomas, is there some reason why the deprecation notices are not called out in > the release notes for a new release? Why are they kept separately? No strong reason. It is part of the release notes but not in the versioned section. Probably because there is no interest in keeping the history of planned deprecations in the release notes. When the API/ABI is changed, the deprecation notice is replaced by an entry in the versioned section.