From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com (mail-wm0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C886B108F for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 21:55:22 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f45.google.com with SMTP id r144so242368545wme.1 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 12:55:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=E+a3EcozaWeb27ZzJLipqEmwLzXyMjZovnURgrBTUhc=; b=vBSZ+BVLtpPskeBIwtF6AX63QjH0YnoF8ROUTsd/z1JROpnNcGCS/ZOoVaDxWZEvDG 53sheDPnUlbS3eN1numSJl0hunnZ8cjOeFbnbOCdY0mIF5mvs9yWN3KZdZ5Hn62e4sym kuugmhPLaaStjZDGto3rMip49ie9UEgI8QBpg/8v5VywbLiaL9eH4IFZG4OnRCGvyU00 0VH51EzlF2GUonTtm6IYAxeiDsS6qmKnrLNfH3RosiCTMorAad8QxfuTytMi5fNXb46n NKZ9ev+jVwNGg4gaMtypyA2jeasHLNxFmTOiZH12Pz27fYYtn4ws7x/1JUDGBCc+8RCI igPQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=E+a3EcozaWeb27ZzJLipqEmwLzXyMjZovnURgrBTUhc=; b=AAyiTZR++cCKZcl4ugGG0L1ctCiwa/l20NTWDUSZ+NSK/MCrUQZOdDTy7gCbL4FwFT xb7yVhdtgRtc5UNWs/ui1tlsUucxH+Toc4CeJpXj3qkNjK+9q+fxZhFbcn8Sx++CziWs ME1vsXLCLaeYVTp8KRYt3liQenLF8r8fKsBdXRqGxOsDwcGTEma2sqINTEoZcjjKXiTy 03I+kI5l7F5zLyJdNnoUdxvSmQQ98/RdZnqhsolWbuSXk5c6t3Uis1DOHsljCzWOyoIC LXBl1o1nLnq7haSL6hhncfoldfras+xk9Kfymt3eJXSnUoj2Ng7CxU9nUMdgp5+iwRH7 jlgQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLjxQxWe0ncRkB9RrfYR0ipOzp75PaySzeL90gy9R07uC4WdAyOW46SZFrtiH7+9fDJ X-Received: by 10.223.136.152 with SMTP id f24mr24922307wrf.187.1484686522564; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 12:55:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z134sm39592012wmc.20.2017.01.17.12.55.21 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 17 Jan 2017 12:55:21 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Bruce Richardson , Ferruh Yigit Cc: Alejandro Lucero , dev@dpdk.org Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 21:55:20 +0100 Message-ID: <2075524.r0YEMkGTG2@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20170116164816.GA25960@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1484308202-5198-1-git-send-email-alejandro.lucero@netronome.com> <29aed2ee-78a9-05d5-b684-01f7b62d10f9@intel.com> <20170116164816.GA25960@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] config: build nfp pmd support by default X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 20:55:22 -0000 2017-01-16 16:48, Bruce Richardson: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 04:43:11PM +0000, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > > On 1/13/2017 11:50 AM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: > > > Because using a NFP PMD requires specific BSP installed, the PMD > > > support was not the default option before. This was just for making > > > people aware of such dependency, since there is no need for such a > > > BSP for just compiling DPDK with NFP PMD support. > > > > Although NFP will compile fine, as far as I understand BSP dependency is > > still there. > > > > Thomas, > > > > What do you think, is compilation enough to be enabled by default? > > > > > > Although you haven't asked me, I think having it compiled by default is > ok, even if you can't run it without the BSP. Having it compiled means > that we can catch errors or problems with the driver sooner, e.g. when > doing updates across all drivers. +1 (I suggested this change to Alejandro if I remember well)