From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8B61A04BC; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 10:45:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D86C1C1E1; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 10:45:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C15BB1C11D for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 10:45:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C01E19BA; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 04:45:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 09 Oct 2020 04:45:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= mSTWP9IGh4pnfS8ISinq12FeRzT7tdUKY325FP6jUB4=; b=Pa9uxzjpSflFOM3I IjmGFo5GNQcLhFwGbm1VblgNsgIso3eKuLcz0XFEmsEUFHncbwY1z4yWko/RGF4L NV3NKTrm7EzmROxNhEDmiQXNPrwO06tvooOPXQ9Jt8baK3cPOcdbyKn2n67t24oM urUs6A1x6vnOW1s7EMxThQoiLN1wfEK+Uc1HPT2zmfGNWVliMe7ryQRrZwUZEyht 3Sh9B4vXNB0MNX2OWELM6StQLTRxRxC2QehcntpUt36h0UOJzKp3BxrZw+eRWkKT mJcmr2FMuY+kDDweHN5yPbA2sESENnsdY8BLKvlzdpeTfI/NYxJtJ5jfRaVuSYm8 eEZ7GA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=mSTWP9IGh4pnfS8ISinq12FeRzT7tdUKY325FP6jU B4=; b=V8mOxBa7mEguQMLG9rpMJNWUShaSQQtYVrr4CKqr9ZATiI9/laRiHtBEk /2NhkPqYwAs8rjy+IBHHuB8bx9pGRkKe6OBke6wTX26OgNaTrFcFDQqiCKKeXpLM seugGFLUlj7weAmBfaGQBpCYxRbITiwyWB17/abLBByxCJoNY+6b7mrMexGQWf8M 70CM8U1j86F7+vtUVRlaopuqbbNrxgUnCSr4KPhzD+vkBgmNpZrcLgU54GY5NX8x vicIJlmPlyESgLENjI2S52I8Avpfib5O6QmmRo0RWNqhCW0dLgZlgYm0a8iLvzmn MfELd+AL64DnSHtDlXjDO3bcaKoGQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrhedugddtkecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpeffvdffjeeuteelfeeileduudeugfetjeelveefkeejfeeigeehteff vdekfeegudenucffohhmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvd dtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhr ohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A0B203280063; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 04:45:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: yang_y_yi , "yangyi01@inspur.com" Cc: "Hu, Jiayu" , "dev@dpdk.org" , olivier.matz@6wind.com, david.marchand@redhat.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2020 10:45:29 +0200 Message-ID: <2087326.quN09hHHGx@thomas> In-Reply-To: <55a25def.562b.1750c69cdbb.Coremail.yang_y_yi@163.com> References: <20200924085740.270192-1-yang_y_yi@163.com> <2426a70a.510c.1750c54904c.Coremail.yang_y_yi@163.com> <55a25def.562b.1750c69cdbb.Coremail.yang_y_yi@163.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/3] doc: update prog_guide and rel_notes for GRO X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 09/10/2020 10:11, yang_y_yi: > Thomas, sorry for quick reply, update for doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_11.rst also has been there, so please ignore this one merge request. > > I'm totally confused. The version Jiayu acked is v7, here are diffstat of v7 I sent, I'm not sure why these documents are updated by previous two merges. I also interdiff two merged patches and local these two patches, diff only has document changes, this is really very weird, what happened? Listen, after several emails about this, I am a bit bored that you don't double check before asking the same question again. Look at the mail I sent to you originally: http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2020-October/184701.html* "Applied with release notes changes integrated in the right commits" Then I explained again: "It has been squashed with the related code change as it should be." It means I did what you were supposed to do: merging the documentation updates in the commits which are doing the code changes. So the changes are atomic with the doc, which helps when digging in the git history. You can see the result by yourself: http://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=1ca5e674 http://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=e2d81106 While we are at it, please reply kindly to Olivier who is trying to understand your issue with mbuf. You keep saying it is his fault without giving the evidence he is asking for. In short: please pay more attention to what the maintainers are saying. Thank you PS: please do not top-post > diffstat 0001-gro-add-UDP-IPv4-GRO-support.patch > gro_udp4.c | 433 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > gro_udp4.h | 281 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > meson.build | 2 > rte_gro.c | 94 ++++++++++--- > rte_gro.h | 5 > 5 files changed, 798 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > diffstat 0002-gro-add-VXLAN-UDP-IPv4-GRO-support.patch > gro_udp4.h | 1 > gro_vxlan_udp4.c | 545 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > gro_vxlan_udp4.h | 153 +++++++++++++++ > meson.build | 2 > rte_gro.c | 115 ++++++++--- > rte_gro.h | 3 > 6 files changed, 792 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) > > $ grep "\.rst" 0001-gro-add-UDP-IPv4-GRO-support.patch > > $ grep "\.rst" 0002-gro-add-VXLAN-UDP-IPv4-GRO-support.patch > > > At 2020-10-09 15:47:49, "yang_y_yi" wrote: > >Thomas, sorry for confusion, previous two merges did include changes against doc/guides/prog_guide/generic_receive_offload_lib.rst, but > >doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_11.rst isn't updated yet, so I posted https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/80105/ to update it, please help merge > >https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/80105/, thanks a lot. > >At 2020-10-09 14:48:19, "Thomas Monjalon" wrote: > >>09/10/2020 08:34, yang_y_yi: > >>> Thomas, only this one of this series hasn't yet been merged, maybe you missed it, also please help merge it, thanks a lot. > >> > >>No I did not miss it. > >>It has been squashed with the related code change as it should be. > >>Please double check. > >> > >>[...] > >>> >> doc/guides/prog_guide/generic_receive_offload_lib.rst | 6 +++--- > >>> >> doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_11.rst | 6 ++++++ > >>> >> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)