From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f48.google.com (mail-wm0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDDB32BA9 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 12:37:59 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f48.google.com with SMTP id p65so159215574wmp.0 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 04:37:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KVojAajgB7TpOL+6oEFsHMaHCHkSjyG79IKsDsR8gcQ=; b=m50O1G0G5/3GigpZrrUmUblEiGdOlbim1WYzOMaRpQ612QZPyseAMXWIco/cS6KK+F oozw/OOipGjyNmEr1R4IRVgedCZwIuzR4KJnlpTNWH2dvKXxF14cWQOnS4dXptGH12kq k87SXTRYdSdwaEQi1r9c4lNojL9K7KlfdaCwGMHWNTq9dX5/BgK8bfRIH27vcgEOlWPP 4oVD9/pccyB/CbGt7Qoq2mz2SniSBfk8tyMjjl2kIc2HBV4J4NpIJeIsDyY4sR3L0VnW ZdWyDfjlzS15ThLYVOxhfdBkGMDslyt/ZkZnFiO8ncevSXOJSLrZYU7MXNaIfjinvG5G +L5A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KVojAajgB7TpOL+6oEFsHMaHCHkSjyG79IKsDsR8gcQ=; b=j6K4nIb1NjOwZ6GR6NflsuKN6oZnfkMZZZ6KKWt9w/hy1b1F7RwFkvEfePPPd+eIfw /jxSLtRULUR9aDwAYDnH6Lh80Qd3zC21pWvyQW2CcCbWeIgt7IUUFkk+IATdoqoRyt6S pHcPe/xLlJ3qLZjB+LVyiomOhno8Pmm53dGobfyVUWcRf9sLzRL6ulM/Kg/gBt868ECJ VDf5hjay33h2SdF66Y2FIlWdTsg63n1+3aFgUAHtqY/gLxYLBm5k2pQRcr5Mj5k171nZ kzvk2mlLv0swFgz2ZLKwktkfBk7vQQ3cDGR+f1XDspXMjn0ewkfoQF65kkSpvbkh09MZ h/Fg== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLLa3kBS9SdT4iidOogACpsyo7jtFxfZ4Qv30SR8R542xzCNnE/WJPcjvSfIjrt7hx9 X-Received: by 10.28.188.5 with SMTP id m5mr19103853wmf.35.1458646679667; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 04:37:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (91.111.75.86.rev.sfr.net. [86.75.111.91]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s66sm17050226wmb.6.2016.03.22.04.37.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 22 Mar 2016 04:37:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy Cc: dev@dpdk.org, gowrishankar Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 12:36:19 +0100 Message-ID: <2090665.MjcR1UzGxo@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <56EA3B33.4040000@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1457360003-30055-1-git-send-email-gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <56EA3B33.4040000@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/ppc: fix secondary process to map hugepages in correct order X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 11:38:00 -0000 Sergio, your help is required here. Thanks 2016-03-17 10:35, gowrishankar: > Could this patch be reviewed please. > > Thanks, > Gowrishankar > > On Monday 07 March 2016 07:43 PM, Gowrishankar wrote: > > From: Gowri Shankar > > > > For a secondary process address space to map hugepages from every segment of > > primary process, hugepage_file entries has to be mapped reversely from the > > list that primary process updated for every segment. This is for a reason that, > > in ppc64, hugepages are sorted for decrementing addresses. > > > > Signed-off-by: Gowrishankar > > --- > > lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++---------- > > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)