From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B76F7A0524; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 17:36:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3327040682; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 17:36:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F37454067B for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 17:36:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CC3E5C0055; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 11:36:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 05 Feb 2021 11:36:20 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh= TPwKQTHKnMNfeZi7CpY++i4KUudO28ssjC8jYPUpQTQ=; b=zYPSKRlxJHmLi8Zp eF88WGYVRgMMbwmsmP743VqWdA2o/E0h98MDALtZjII12tBSrnDUVrkT0iJhS1qo zLVkyjyhjpmYphqMGzYkXMu9G/hyLNmDv56X0WA/9tJpIwoQcn8x2EY5kOoBMDx4 78mtLbP2V/JF83TadIj0GIRV/xm+DFskDtM2EwsqRmOT6zG93H8MQPrTUgc24DMj WfSIU9uJg//U2unTddZH/suxCpidhFTsh2w9ZXU4lnOXdKVIVicS97mDmhFD/H98 39CZelBKpgjo4xkYsbgTnGZdBHPv+gFsRQetfmN/jqcllHqlP9u/p70+nznPEcwd vfeQiA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=TPwKQTHKnMNfeZi7CpY++i4KUudO28ssjC8jYPUpQ TQ=; b=FZcUP5ShR1+0Q2osGuJWNBZopAPkeK/d0Ye9tIl+eMDgRv8oGX405+cDs q2Vh47k+wLo52R8NLaEKD0SdHY3mah/NAtmGlO/pSauz0F3UXIeIgW1aney3VvsQ 4XLtvnyK5S59MOuJo9uB04rkMpbpdya25PCyb6wlTWR65V8VnTnrn0bMZKVGK+Yc CT4ceZd+WeJhXKBdinPUTvlKV5M2la736tgZqwH75vcKDrQhhGjO/8bUv3n16Lso PvISo8m/GH147xIwzJSjxXWoP6/MmeJCI3oOCr3fK8kMLh9FGVOINPmg4XaB9p+A pOcRmiXav3AJ5f5gHm1VQ75AuOriw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrgeeigdejhecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdejueei iedvffegheenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhho nhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9FF05240062; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 11:36:19 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: Bruce Richardson , jerinj@marvell.com Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 17:36:17 +0100 Message-ID: <2092642.3WurhKR3Qy@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20210204095622.GA1712@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20210203211818.3047146-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <20210204095622.GA1712@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] config: increase default maximum number of NUMA nodes X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 04/02/2021 10:56, Bruce Richardson: > On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 10:18:18PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > AMD CPU can present a high number of NUMA nodes. > > The default should be 32 for better compatibility. > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon > > --- > Seems reasonable. > > Acked-by: Bruce Richardson Applied with additional explanation: On a dual-socket with 16 CCXs per CPU, the option "CCX (or LLC) as NUMA domain" will expose 32 NUMA nodes.