From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sessmg23.ericsson.net (sessmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.45]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4E8B368 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 18:10:31 +0200 (CEST) X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-f798a6d000000e9b-2a-53dbbc745d3c Received: from ESESSHC002.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sessmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id DF.D5.03739.47CBBD35; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 18:12:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ESESSMB105.ericsson.se ([169.254.5.228]) by ESESSHC002.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.24]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 18:12:35 +0200 From: Sunil Bojanapally To: "Liu, Jijiang" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] VMDq + DCB: 128 Tx queues Thread-Index: Ac+tR0lr3xkHcRQlQJKQfb53pqRgtAAA+8gAABYLtoo= Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 16:12:35 +0000 Message-ID: <2093D5E48464CB43A02B12483F758F7A1A3BB243@ESESSMB105.ericsson.se> References: <53DB21E4.1030405@ericsson.com>, <1ED644BD7E0A5F4091CF203DAFB8E4CC01D5618F@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1ED644BD7E0A5F4091CF203DAFB8E4CC01D5618F@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-cm-message-id: 14069095516977390f5dfeb46a0d12aca7d6598387fccd0153dbbc6faa637349694437 x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.149] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprEIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvjW7JntvBBvunaVi8+7SdyWLloVOs DkwevxYsZfVYvOclUwBTFJdNSmpOZllqkb5dAldGx7tm9oJ2qYq+lresDYy7RbsYOTkkBEwk zk66yg5hi0lcuLeerYuRi0NI4CijxNK9z5ggnMVAztc/rCBVbAIWEru+bWQEsUUEtCSeXHvP AmIzCyhKfFowCcwWFjCUeHb8NVSNkcTpKfuZIGwriQ19e9lAbBYBFYk73/eD2bwCvhJbr84A my8kUCxx6sw/sDinQIhEy7EZYHMYga77fmoNE8QucYlbT+YzQVwtILFkz3lmCFtU4uXjf6wQ drjErs8HoeJKEmsPb4e6M1/i7aMjUHsFJU7OfMIygVFsFpKxs5CUzUJSBhHXkViw+xMbhK0t sWzha2YY+8yBx0zI4gsY2VcxihanFhfnphsZ66UWZSYXF+fn6eWllmxiBEbiwS2/dXcwrn7t eIhRgINRiYdXoeVWsBBrYllxZe4hRmkOFiVx3kXn5gULCaQnlqRmp6YWpBbFF5XmpBYfYmTi 4JRqYNTdYbK/6vM7pU2v+Hkzpq1Ueff11FH1EPclfqX+XVuDhWZWxEpfv+k7eaFQ+x6hrX8c n/pWL9r4rmRN7qm/Jnp6XzSnb3k4/ZKCSMXzS4sFFSUP2KXq3tK7/CVXwcrWJtbM6JZs0rez L6x8J9de3aJS4Hja9enFTfmmF05bRRyZdcPI0nmBw10lluKMREMt5qLiRAAIp7/zpQIAAA== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] VMDq + DCB: 128 Tx queues X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 16:10:31 -0000 Thanks Liu for the pointer to function implemented in testpmd.c Just want to know in RX configured pools, what scheduling method is used in= polling the queues. -Sunil On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Liu, Jijiang > wrote: Yes, if you hope TX is configured DCB mode, and 128 TX queues are needed. I= n testpmd codes, there is an example how to use 128 RX queue and 128 TX que= ue simultaneously in vmdq+dcb mode. The example function is get_eth_dcb_conf() in testpmd.c file. BRs, Jijiang Liu -----Original Message----- From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Sunil Bojanapally Sent: Friday, August 01, 2014 1:13 PM To: dev@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-dev] VMDq + DCB: 128 Tx queues Hi team, As per dpdk programming guide on VMDq+DCB will configure each Ethernet port= to 16 pools with 8 queues each. Which means per port will have 128 Rx & Tx= queues. The question is, in order to have end 2 end QoS support the port should get= configured with 128 Rx as well as 128 Tx queues ? Note: I am considering same port for Rx & Tx. Thanks, Sunil