From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7E0243295; Sun, 5 Nov 2023 21:27:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC694029E; Sun, 5 Nov 2023 21:27:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 207F940278 for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2023 21:27:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EAEF5C0079; Sun, 5 Nov 2023 15:27:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 05 Nov 2023 15:27:23 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t= 1699216043; x=1699302443; bh=uGz1BzV1DjhhQktP/RPAbjAnwdTNlI4+O1H CMVVn6E4=; b=euANHYG2WmzUfvvh+c1h6DQeII7n5R8d0dQpROJgMCusNfENvY3 ItyPycWoGNbWYAAtQi/ldt2Lqto7i7Q9JaR+RABzkIgvW9Z9Z3yw+giA7ELJR2PK 2J0YmKrkq9aPa1Wwt9kjF0PTDB3sP0f1N+iwhUSb6Z8Z/HjC7soeZb7CQt0NMqL4 9FYi8reDOXg9NSw/aOZh7r0xzjbFdtHDjL8BgCgzW3nmbPuseMgPZ8yEw2/qT2jp UMT08LUx92keN8MDqHIsWtg689sXcjlK/enrAgksNJ6llmjxXMiCi6rCsOGnHONa nzbINBUpQoTI8ffYUI341F+fd8LIpoy8BXw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t= 1699216043; x=1699302443; bh=uGz1BzV1DjhhQktP/RPAbjAnwdTNlI4+O1H CMVVn6E4=; b=EGlWvdOwVODkh3EZtLoun+eag8iJa2J0oYXDqoyYaubgxw+1ixg FRRfr1hFS2BHnF9/I/1aztqUk5PzKkZYQN3SONo8T/N4FZ5nc4VX9ftzaqi6JUF/ 5JyXIX5Dd4cCprB+70dtOXO6RhZ3bDW95pwV8Trqv3dLMoWFj1QlHKO26OM2HvxO 4HVTwMkZB/sDzq83ao9zm5m4WMBfoOgY9Yi59g3wKCZV0KLxTfriHC3Lm8XYVf9y PkrHuD0usJvpjLBsj8ByJyOTWifNiU6oJYVLlWuNqdOvlTBLilNGZ8QkS9IlMNsi mAFgRx6T3gx5w+YmUw1axVwkrZbRobF0Krg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvkedrudduvddgudefjecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvfevufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhho mhgrshcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqne cuggftrfgrthhtvghrnheptdejieeifeehtdffgfdvleetueeffeehueejgfeuteeftddt ieekgfekudehtdfgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilh hfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 5 Nov 2023 15:27:21 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: rasland@nvidia.com, Gregory Etelson Cc: dev@dpdk.org, getelson@nvidia.com, mkashani@nvidia.com, Ori Kam , Matan Azrad , Viacheslav Ovsiienko , Suanming Mou , asafp@nvidia.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/30] net/mlx5: add rte_device parameter to locate HWS registers Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2023 21:27:19 +0100 Message-ID: <2099375.bB369e8A3T@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20231029163202.216450-4-getelson@nvidia.com> References: <20231029163202.216450-1-getelson@nvidia.com> <20231029163202.216450-4-getelson@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 29/10/2023 17:31, Gregory Etelson: > 1. Add rte_eth_dev parameter to the `flow_hw_get_reg_id()` > > 2. Add mlx5_flow_hw_get_reg_id() > > Signed-off-by: Gregory Etelson > Acked-by: Ori Kam > --- This, > -static void > +void > flow_rxq_mark_flag_set(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) > { and this, > +void > +flow_rxq_mark_flag_set(struct rte_eth_dev *dev); are completely unrelated changes, and probably unneeded.