From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>,
"anatoly.burakov@intel.com" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] examples/multi_process/symmetric_mp: fix link check
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 15:03:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2108513.ynXuZs2m7e@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190327112348.12785-1-akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
27/03/2019 12:33, Akhil Goyal:
> link check is done for primary process for the ports
> which are given in the port mask and not the complete
> set of ports.
>
> Fixes: d3641ae86313 ("examples: update link status checks")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
> ---
> for (portid = 0; portid < port_num; portid++) {
The logic of this loop is wrong.
The port ids may be not contiguous.
Look at RTE_ETH_FOREACH_DEV* for such iteration.
> - if ((port_mask & (1 << portid)) == 0)
> + if ((mask & (1 << portid)) == 0)
> continue;
[...]
> - check_all_ports_link_status((uint8_t)num_ports, (~0x0));
> + check_all_ports_link_status(rte_eth_dev_count(), port_mask);
The function rte_eth_dev_count is deprecated.
It should be noticed when compiling.
On more comment, I think such wrong implementation is existing
in many examples:
% git grep -l 'check_all_ports_link_status(.*num'
app/test/test_pmd_perf.c
examples/link_status_interrupt/main.c
examples/load_balancer/init.c
examples/multi_process/client_server_mp/mp_server/init.c
examples/multi_process/symmetric_mp/main.c
examples/server_node_efd/server/init.c
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-05 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-27 11:22 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Akhil Goyal
2019-03-27 11:22 ` Akhil Goyal
2019-03-27 11:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Akhil Goyal
2019-03-27 11:33 ` Akhil Goyal
2019-04-05 12:42 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-05 12:42 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-05 13:03 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2019-04-05 13:03 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2108513.ynXuZs2m7e@xps \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).