From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com (mail-wi0-f171.google.com [209.85.212.171]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC0A91A1 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 14:23:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: by wicpl12 with SMTP id pl12so25958123wic.1 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 05:23:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=Tx/pdpV4GIgCAOSlfQ0NZXRCVh9TcfzpAC2bjsqsEBw=; b=WmKaCOir8AhcI/LX05a8t2vPJFCoqVPqiqMpZf1SVRDRY/q87ihk468ufeGgDYMYgr UfpPrE5liP8Vr6Hijk5/OCDCgWp8XZIXsCPJQIUtX98Vg2vqJplVJDXYHcx9bPKsfJbS 5P/RsFRrFHnxygfvpjJs0XTRQN+VPrsSA7DYV5wOBROydNPKsQYt1fBErQbueqQlMmiq /FZRFFE+nDH+T1RbtWkwu9hIhXR8/6cl2gLarfCTaljQANJp4V/emMoXiYzPX7Py1WAw iJV6bWt4BDjKBcZMBVgvw8rdeqZlWlZTdM3d9DADzxbQzMqQ83OeoEiNpO0a1U6+6M1a ZN+w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkm2TClAgOW+IA+l13DBXmkJ85jUqAWqeZl02SRKTcADBzIMRmuDsr23EXhAyKUB10mPVnL X-Received: by 10.194.142.178 with SMTP id rx18mr7740126wjb.106.1441023797692; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 05:23:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p5sm17795657wiy.17.2015.08.31.05.23.16 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 31 Aug 2015 05:23:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Martin =?utf-8?B?RHJhxaFhcg==?= Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 14:22:07 +0200 Message-ID: <2119986.60i7VtTGDM@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <55E42F25.4020406@ics.muni.cz> References: <55E40A4F.3030406@ics.muni.cz> <4354342.IqQZSKtSMX@xps13> <55E42F25.4020406@ics.muni.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Removal of IP version from packet offload feature flags X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 12:23:18 -0000 2015-08-31 12:40, Martin Dra=C5=A1ar: > Dne 31.8.2015 v 10:56 Thomas Monjalon napsal(a): > > In order to keep compatibility with your old code, you have to disa= ble > > RTE_NEXT_ABI in your configuration file (.config). >=20 > I have done this and the code works, but because the project is in > prototype stage, I would like to keep it working with the newest vers= ion. >=20 > > See "Extended packet type support" in > > =09http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_2_1.html > > and > > =09http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.html > > >=20 > Now I remember that I read this. However, nowhere I see possible valu= es > for the packet_type. Is it documented somewhere, or will this be > documented in upcoming release? It does not appear in doxygen (patch welcome) but it is documented. Check RTE_PTYPE_* in lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h