From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B89E3A00C5; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 09:42:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 837264C8B; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 09:42:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 149CC2F42; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 09:42:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1033334; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 03:42:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 11 Jun 2020 03:42:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= N2k2CBxrlXUDd9Qde7tGp0/ba7w3Tk3qYKdlh1o9FbY=; b=Nhx3NOVP7QbgXlL3 2s28EKMihYSZaRqQH7TNDCmB4sY3LImeSgzsCQj5fXA0Fw1OJ0b+7qr9aI6i/tcC GsA5YIYAubLq4T2fBjqFnINfMB8NOBR01kxLD4Dr+4krRJkadBjQI2JnNYIlvRUJ XaE7tT8eH7pzAKwnuoxhZUCWyYhbCzikL9dV5nNO0N9P+sGdRTztL9BdfsMcfozb YH6GovONQauB5fdIg3/4ISv877OQLUtUNFXSY0kLdzznAc0hhsHUg5jLXFK/XAy6 JAmCtc1edmfahR1sKR2h5ZbfwBHrHbBa2/QWv2fJ0FdfrMmvilwMvFUn+k4D/dLL loOCGw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=N2k2CBxrlXUDd9Qde7tGp0/ba7w3Tk3qYKdlh1o9F bY=; b=oxiwFbPrekJWmBVfNTf17kmLotqn4zfrgXC8iOyyNYGAV3KZ44OeOeU8F 7LNGMEm/9hU8bif0JVvQL+cgpFclABXIkLzsbxMqP1Es++z+qMZ3I3ncfOZXtnxt IUEshPjizcpt4TCpvqsYNKIFNvyMdcrF9WXKfcVByeVSWVlquviGUEVWqKr4mYQ3 QTNqGZw0wCdl9B1XxMPCcfzg/zbbo4r05H7TLMZFKv5GubE1vPF7g4lxYcRM2BjK oTNTMYl/orKT8bPXfRB+SbtW8dZszosUfs3Nboa/7N5JwoSYYfAYztX9ezKWjv5f 3HCpQO0NeQ9vDMT/aGBG1PbCC+bqA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrudehjedguddvgecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdej ueeiiedvffegheenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrh fuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgr lhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5BC99328005E; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 03:42:50 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Xiaolong Ye Cc: Olivier Matz , Konstantin Ananyev , dev@dpdk.org, haiyue.wang@intel.com, stable@dpdk.org Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 09:42:49 +0200 Message-ID: <2135063.brjnbXG0BY@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20200609071256.59837-1-xiaolong.ye@intel.com> References: <20200609052955.59196-1-xiaolong.ye@intel.com> <20200609071256.59837-1-xiaolong.ye@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mbuf: remove unused next member in dyn flag/field X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 09/06/2020 09:12, Xiaolong Ye: > TAILQ_ENTRY next is not needed in struct mbuf_dynfield_elt and > mbuf_dynflag_elt, since they are actually chained by rte_tailq_entry's > next field when calling TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(mbuf_dynfield/dynflag_list, te, > next). > > Fixes: 4958ca3a443a ("mbuf: support dynamic fields and flags") > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: Xiaolong Ye > Acked-by: Olivier Matz Applied, thanks