From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com (mail-wm0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EE6F37B2 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 16:11:25 +0100 (CET) Received: by wmpp66 with SMTP id p66so64801687wmp.1 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 07:11:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=JuFVkTA/ACdhKrkjMX/otHPFvO32kYuDRP4mFibJtuY=; b=XU54BOek/1hOHHZU5HtLjQWgTg8pPmeNQQu+76ytQkUIasLmQ88JfLjyoAGOvuU9+u 0c9p1JGLW9pOvw1jywHgzLwwNy9ZwQwjvvyBLQ2sUXohED+OQLdN0Uu77eYq1IsHQ55M 8AyeF1yNScJSwOXlSj8TLVTJa4seqizKXkmloRRq0YXGOCVn/WJzhhlv3oABTTrniT5p AjS++rtsJ9PvnK0dper6C4Rxpn/4ZPyNTWV/msPUKbgcZhZ5THdaZTFfHFUNob1T3Ucl TLqFSsuGGAR39fvHwUQAfUP+6PHfvLmGE/lvqCxgdD5L9ur9wl+WF/4OmVdRJMvDE8jd 5pTQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=JuFVkTA/ACdhKrkjMX/otHPFvO32kYuDRP4mFibJtuY=; b=Ehm9cP8t/LP+4Lcu5XrbBBTib/yEXkYRnsjRPRfC+ZXF8eWb4RjSA7cSl8nMtXaz7m lc9zAXcd0837Oe5k74G+fNFO2IAyoBcePTlFcM++3OdqtPXCa1sjrCaeZ3OoB1/GHyG5 ILvB9p/2igtzSY3vjQB2mjzoDsLhEw3bv1BwmW3IkbvWagXYO3SC0eaCaLG3/zcGDXek wmTVaregjPtCOJ994NqZg8h9lv01TEDbLzef6T/tnOYQoYcxRl9S2KLaqNgVBAt7Zwiz yG5KDvfric1XYBYYtQy8cC13JLrBw1+CzQncYOHj0GKmM8PEaicZGFuPISJlRrsrHrkg 6j7A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnwjzCVRk4usiOR0YM30NecfeoGZ1CbVpx17eCuPyJTWcHTMS3Fbj+QXK4JKQVwRetjZSSXrnQGdElJ121g6AuIBdA9aQ== X-Received: by 10.28.91.9 with SMTP id p9mr23222240wmb.18.1450105502785; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 07:05:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h5sm30147957wjz.21.2015.12.14.07.05.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 14 Dec 2015 07:05:02 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Jijiang Liu Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 16:03:46 +0100 Message-ID: <2136605.pcfb1tFB10@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1449639461-9718-1-git-send-email-jijiang.liu@intel.com> References: <1449639461-9718-1-git-send-email-jijiang.liu@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: announce ABI change for struct rte_eth_tunnel_flow X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 15:11:25 -0000 2015-12-09 13:37, Jijiang Liu: > The struct 'rte_eth_tunnel_flow' is only used by struct 'rte_eth_fdir_flow' now, but its name is generic, > and I plan to extend new fileds like below to support generic configuration for tunneling packet. You have not explained what the changes are for. So it's really difficult to have an opinion. Please describe an use case. PS: "filed" -> "field"