Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] drivers/octeontx2: allow experimental symbols

[Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>]

27/11/2019 09:34, Sunil Kumar Kori:
> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> >26/11/2019 07:15, Sunil Kumar Kori:
> >> Multiple experimental symbols are used. They must be allowed to avoid
> >> compilation error.
> >
> >If there was an error,
> >1/ I would see it in my compilation test 2/ There would be some "Fixes:" tag to
> >point the root cause
> 
> Actually change is part of below series which is started using experimental symbols in mentioned driver.
> Apart of these drivers, FLAGs are already present in other drivers so that there is no error found. 
> Error occurs when applying below series. 
> 
> So I had two options to get it done. Either I can do Makefile changes along with the corresponding changes or
> make them as a separate patch. I have chosen second option.

This is the wrong choice :)
When you do a change, it should be atomic, i.e. includes changes which are dependent.

> And because of this is new change, it does not contain any "Fixes" tag.
> >
> >I guess this patch is not critical.
> >Where are patches 2, 3, 4, 5?
> Following are the series of patches:
> http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/63299/
> http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/63271/
> http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/63272/
> http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/63273/
> http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/63274/
> Not all the patches are reworked for next versions that's why same is not reflected in subject line. 

When you send a new version, you should send the whole series again.
And please don't forget changelogs and --in-reply-to.

Thanks