From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E66EA04DC; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 23:12:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06692C8FE; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 23:12:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from new1-smtp.messagingengine.com (new1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.221]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 296E4C830 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 23:12:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEBCC580520; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 17:12:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 19 Oct 2020 17:12:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= ZqoT3951R4wjXqRH/RxCb0eleuS4R+9gqRiUzf3yAuA=; b=RXOZ0HN50Wvtebk/ wBMW8r+oSndCd1a2oU/sdD6GenhqpX5Uzf7rnGs/ojhvssTCK+CsB0HoiEPWRRIA +d66QItsKMDuRn7jbSjpr606csNedk2idOoJWjBqNKkQLwzqx+3B5VlIu5bWXnMx Ca9VYmaI4bJHsPY+4xuTQlJvJdmAD0w8DWTVQIXODA/CNL5Cvf3CnoDkO79ie5Hh FmVpzjIYC+TtN+kD4ZVbbaeQORrrajsvxWIJAQtOmgK4+DN6lU/TbTogBGgCT09/ QU5YvC0xLSS6MXasiZDkETWmA2216d2zYvRaFEJeHVIz16cC2HpgW9B3h8NeHWU7 572cvA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=ZqoT3951R4wjXqRH/RxCb0eleuS4R+9gqRiUzf3yA uA=; b=Xy4VfxRmn8BE68vS1PkBG4hQ2H3w6RzuTRXJlKepdbVPL6XgHqhf2KBaQ 93MlEnRpmj2/nxfjjgArQrTbQBkIEDcTayesbGzCGyWWyaOpaOcXOfgKfUiG0qdN pBTZmjpyZYgDxDQt94sPWGnZMiym/j9HRVFcXwFM35BUnzdKI6369Ej5c6JoUzyG pvb59hpFZ1Nfzijksv0CeNV3emIBJcuWPJXHfy+rkOEynZsV8+rXOsheWOSiTlkL wN36TKKWvWMgCxxdZTYCdkjpNVTBQuH+y2LZQWxFlDZJZ9Zc2Xf+TzkYTtK/r+q+ 1utn0ZALRblKFPmPOUb5tlRuR7xcQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrjedvgddvfecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdejueei iedvffegheenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhho nhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7E8453064684; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 17:12:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ruifeng Wang , honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Liang Ma , Jan Viktorin , David Christensen , Bruce Richardson , Konstantin Ananyev , david.hunt@intel.com, jerinjacobk@gmail.com, timothy.mcdaniel@intel.com, gage.eads@intel.com, chris.macnamara@intel.com, Anatoly Burakov , david.marchand@redhat.com Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 23:12:41 +0200 Message-ID: <2164670.uy6Bi0JdNo@thomas> In-Reply-To: <7d5724730715ccfbf55baceae42b91a2351020f8.1602763439.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com> References: <7d5724730715ccfbf55baceae42b91a2351020f8.1602763439.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 02/10] eal: add power management intrinsics X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 15/10/2020 14:04, Anatoly Burakov: > +/** > + * This function is not supported on ARM. > + */ > +static inline void > +rte_power_monitor(const volatile void *p, const uint64_t expected_value, > + const uint64_t value_mask, const uint64_t tsc_timestamp, > + const uint8_t data_sz) > +{ > + RTE_SET_USED(p); > + RTE_SET_USED(expected_value); > + RTE_SET_USED(value_mask); > + RTE_SET_USED(tsc_timestamp); > + RTE_SET_USED(data_sz); > +} Are you sure it cannot be partially supported with WFE instruction?