From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f43.google.com (mail-wm0-f43.google.com [74.125.82.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80F828DA5 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 14:58:53 +0100 (CET) Received: by wmll128 with SMTP id l128so25441157wml.0 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 06:58:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind_com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=sUqVixaMJwruhJZpOvM7XizZ1DgrPy7GtdFegMnomv0=; b=Cq9kMa9NKXP1QLmIASDO5K9GzhFvAiwXSqOp1wtA8FvXh6ZwEoEgEer/UW9F0QwUCT i3hHofqZOI6b7XDyyqdcjGzVYtlvvAcjIfG1D9M7Jv8al3Ji4XXhlo7k6E8yloV6+Viu /ROxYn9ClboyvWLyERAe39+x0p0A7QjrFRdtY3gYjfzQY9O8PrwQEdccexHDSQveXrpG lNUEuNfF//YcJz2MfOoGjYPeWdoNY/ghIde2/y8lvHumlUsDymxrFgIKKIobyJXONHDS qVul8VjfUPKD7Q2RtKc3P239A8IId2ZgA/1z0k5NnyI3xJnfXy+BDNzEStNljKmHM9IS kEpQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=sUqVixaMJwruhJZpOvM7XizZ1DgrPy7GtdFegMnomv0=; b=HLCsqAGoFbGVKRtvcbUryxZZ3UEIYm3yJ5YX0gl5jNEEKqJvfAuodfqZvnqqAjB8Nk UMC7MRy9tzNfn3Iit3Io5Kg3VYZHr6tixYoI6JU9u3t1BtlAm25li8A6JcxKBaTsQUVa 5AdmUgSuPDkJi23WRSklRFeU0dXasdGUP+MF9VuFLgbXW1g8yBZrvUBFTxwm/uCVhKeY Bt7fqaj4tbzJGY/Pj0m5KzDASaaogq2Tqmw8YBlb7+ikcSsCHYAPsPJC1LBXvvMuH6Ml U0f84CotlWIbrL0iLOPw3phAhOuOyCLwVC57QPFNXVnq4nyskgLQmpdSZQ1NYoVBS7rE thqQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk7lcHNADW5ety0PoSduxCRMWaPzIm1C8w8uuH0mUTX1Dij8ZplxcPLn27HzdVEUCiNqVmB X-Received: by 10.28.19.146 with SMTP id 140mr6744376wmt.96.1446127133357; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 06:58:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v9sm1922536wjv.45.2015.10.29.06.58.52 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 29 Oct 2015 06:58:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: David Marchand , Bruce Richardson Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 14:57:42 +0100 Message-ID: <2182686.Rj6sEZi19Z@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1445615606-3885-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> <20151029134815.GA15580@bricha3-MOBL3> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] scripts: add checkpatch wrapper X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 13:58:53 -0000 2015-10-29 14:54, David Marchand: > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 02:34:32PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > I agree with both of you. > > > I could suggest something but I'm afraid it will be difficult to have a > > > consensus between a "quiet tool" and a "double check verbose tool". > > > As it is a really critical piece of code, I think we should have a > > meeting > > > with a technical steering comittee ;) > > > ... or we can add an option: -q or -v ? Debate is open :D > > > > Yes, the whole future of the project could hinge on this decision :-) > > Eheh :-) > > > Ok, my suggestion is both! > > 1) Have the default (in case of no errors), be a single line print out at > > the end > > stating number of files scanned > > 2) If "-q" flag specified, skip this > > 3) If "-v" flag specified, do current behaviour with a line per file. > > Ok for me. I'm really happy we can have a sane consensus to this difficult question, with just few emails! Thanks guys :) PS: I will send a v2 when the easy task of RC1 integration will be done ;)